Abstract
Background: The cucurbit fruits are usually used around the world and are seasonal products
traditionally used in human food. They are considered as a source of antioxidants which protect
human body from several diseases.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the antioxidant contents (total phenolics, flavanoids,
flavanols, condensed tannins, carotenoids, and vitamin C) and the antioxidant activity of the fruits of
Cucurbita pepo and Cucurbita moschata harvested in Bejaia from Algeria.
Methods: The quantification of the antioxidants was performed using spectrophotometric methods.
The antioxidant activity of the extracts was determined using the DPPH• and the ABTS•+ radical scavengers
effect. Beforehand, the optimization of the solvent extraction of total phenolics was investigated
using 7 different solvents: water, acetone and ethanol at 90, 60 and 30% (v/v).
Results: The results showed that the acetone 90% (v/v) was the solvent which gave the extract with
the better content of total phenolics (42.44 ± 0.41 mg Gallic Acid Equivalent/100 g FW). The concentrations
of total phenolics, flavonoids, flavonols, carotenoids and vitamin C were higher in C. pepo
than C. moschata. The higher antioxidant activity of the acetone extract was showed by C. moschata
fruit (38.66 ± 1.39%) for DPPH• radical, while C. pepo fruit developed the higher antioxidant activity
for ABTS•+ radical (46.89±1.05%).
Conclusion: The richness of Cucurbita species in antioxidants allows them to be used in different industries
including agri-food to protect from oxidation.
Keywords:
Acetonic extract, antioxidant activities, ascorbic acid content, carotenoids content, Cucurbita moschata, Cucurbita
pepo, phenolic compounds content.
Graphical Abstract
[7]
Robinson RW. Horticultural sciences department. New York 1995.
[18]
Al-Turki S, Shahba MA, Stushnoff C. Diversity of antioxidant properties and phenolic content of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruits as affected by cultivar and location. J Food Agric Environ 2010; 8(1): 253-60.
[22]
Makkar HPS, Sidhuraju P, Becker A. Plant secondary metabolites Methods of molecular biology. Humana press 2000.
[27]
Wangcharoen W, Morasuk W. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of some Thai culinary plants. Int J Sci Technol 2007; 01(02): 100-6.
[30]
Blessing AC, Ifeanyi UM, Chijioke OB. Nutritional evaluation of some Nigerian pumpkins (Cucurbita spp.). Fruit Veg Cereal Sci Biotechnol 2011; 5(2): 64-71.
[35]
Dini I, Tenore GC, Dini A. Effect of industrial and domestic processing on antioxidant properties of pumpkin pulp. J Food Sci Technol 2013; 53: 382-5.
[36]
Tamer CE, İncedayi B, Yönel SP, Yonak S, Çopur ÖU. Evaluation of several quality criteria of low calorie pumpkin dessert. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca 2010; 38(1): 76-80.
[39]
Okwu DE, Ukanwa NS. Nutritive value and phytochemical contents of fluted pumpkin (Telfaria Occidentalis Hook f) vegetable grown with different levels of turkey droppings. Afr Crop Sci Conf Proc 2007; 8: 17591964.
[42]
Lugasi A, Hovari J, Sagi KV, Bíró L. The role of antioxidant phytonutriente in the prevention of the diseases. Acta Biol Szeged 2003; 47(1-4): 119-25.
[43]
Miean KH, Mohamed S. Flavonoid (Myricetin, Quercetin, Kaempferol, Luteolin, and Apigenin) content of edible tropical plants. J Agric Food Chem 2000; 49(6): 3106-12.
[49]
Gajewski M, Radzanowska J, Danilcenko H, Jariene E, Cerniauskiene J, et al. Quality of pumpkin cultivars in relation to sensory characteristics. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca 2008; 36(1): 73.
[56]
Azizah AH, Wee KC, Azizah O, Azizah M. Effect of boiling and stir frying on total phenolics, carotenoids and radical scavenging activity of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschato). Int Food Res J 2009; 16(1): 45-51.