Abstract
Background: The demand from consumers for safe, healthy food with a long shelf life,
with no change in taste or nutritive value, has made food safety a key concern in today's world.
Traditional thermal food processing technology has trouble meeting these standards. Conventional
thermal and non-thermal processing has limitations and to overcome these limitations more
studies are conducted regarding the novel non-thermal food processing methods.
Objective: The goal of this paper was to present an overview of the research on the development
of non-thermal processing techniques, such as electrofreezing, high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed
electric fields, ultrasound, pulsed light, and plasma activated water, as well as their advantages
and limitations.
Methods: The present review aims to summarize findings related to novel non-thermal processing
techniques, gathered from work published in scientific journals, related books, and book chapters
from sources such as Web of Science (WoS), Google Scholar, Scopus and ScienceDirect.
Results: Non-thermal treatment may result in more desirable outcomes, such as greater preservation
of heat-sensitive nutrients, fewer changes in sensorial as well as physico-chemical quality of
the processed foods.
Conclusion: Compared to traditional heat processing, the nutritional value of foods is better preserved,
and the sensory qualities of foods are less altered. These novel techniques can be combined
with each other to achieve higher efficiency and overcome other limitations. More studies
should be conducted regarding the combination of novel non-thermal techniques to achieve
greater efficiency.
Keywords:
Food safety, non-thermal processing, principle, advantages, limitations, food quality.
Graphical Abstract
[3]
Stoica M, Bahrim G, Cârâc G. Factors that influence the electric field effects on fungal cells. Science against microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances. 2011: 291-302
[4]
Valizadeh R, Kargarsana H, Shojaei M, Mehbodnia M. Effect of high intensity pulsed electric fields on microbial inactivation of cow milk. J Anim Vet Adv 2009; 8(12): 2638-43.
[12]
Pivarnik LF, Worobo R. Non-thermal or alternative food processing methods to enhance microbial safety and quality. NIFA-USDA Bulletin 2014; 8: 8.
[14]
Heath J. Fumigation for the Commercial/Noncommercial Pesticide Applicator: Revision of the 3rd Edition. University of Nebraska - Lincoln 2018.
[16]
Bratovcic A. Nanomaterials in food processing and packaging, its toxicity and food labeling. Act Sci Nutr Health 2020; 4(9): 07-13.
[19]
Ozimek L, Pospiech E, Narine S. Nanotechnologies in food and meat processing. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 2010; 9(4): 401-12.
[22]
Powell M, Colin M. Nanotechnology and food safety: potential benefits, possible risks?. CAB reviews perspectives in agriculture veterinary science nutrition and natural resources. 2008. 3:16
[25]
Tarafdar JC, Sharma S, Raliya R. Nanotechnology: Interdisciplinary science of applications. Afr J Biotechnol 2013; 12(3) 219-226
[29]
Raj AAS, Ragavi J, Rubila S, Tirouthchelvamae D, Ranganathan T. Recent trends in nanotechnology applications in foods. IJERT 2013; 2(10): 956-61.
[30]
Mallika C, Pandey M, Radhakrishna K, Bawa A. Nano-technology: Applications in food industry. Indian Food Ind 2005; 24: 19-21.
[34]
Nickols-Richardson S, Piehowski K. Nanotechnology in nutritional sciences. Minerva Biotecnol 2008; 20(3): 117.
[38]
Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006; 311(5761): 622-7.
[58]
Tapp C, Rice RG. Generation and control of ozone. In: Ozone in food processing Wiley 2012; pp. 33-54
[70]
Stoica M, Mihalcea L, Borda D, Alexe P. Non-thermal novel food processing technologies. An overview. J Agroaliment Processes Technol 2013; 19(2): 212-7.
[73]
Jan A, Sood M, Sofi S, Norzom T. Non-thermal processing in food applications: A review. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2017; 2(6): 171-80.
[76]
Barba F, Sant’Ana A, Orlien V, Koubaa M. Innovative technologies for food preservation: Inactivation of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms. Academic Press 2017.
[95]
Kumar Y, Patel KK, Kumar V. Pulsed electric field processing in food technology. Int J Eng Res Technol 2015; 1(2): 6-17.
[100]
Clark JP. High-pressure processing research continues. Food Technol 2006; 60(2): 63-5.
[112]
Hokmollahi F, Ehsani M. High pressure processing and its application in cheese manufacturing: A review. J Food Biosci Technol 2017; 7(2): 57-66.
[114]
Ramírez R, Torres J. Chemical and quality changes when seeking fuller utilization of seafood resources by pressure processing technologies Fish Processing byproducts A Sustainable Future Alaska Sea Grant. AK: University of Alaska Fairbanks 2009; pp. 189-206.
[118]
Schwarzenbolz U, Klostermeyer H, Henle T. In Maillard reaction under high hydrostatic pressure: Studies on the formation of protein-bound amino acid derivatives. International Congress Series. Elsevier 2002; pp. 223-7.
[122]
Jung S, Tonello-Samson C. High hydrostatic pressure food processing: Potential and limitations. RSC Green Chem 2018; 53: 251-315.
[126]
Liepa M, Zagorska J, Galoburda R. High-pressure processing as novel technology in dairy industry: A review. Res Rural Dev 2016; 1(1): 76-83.