Abstract
Background: Transverse colostomy is commonly performed to create temporary stoma in
rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Conventional methods are either
difficult to implement or to care for. To resolve these problems, we herein describe a modified
transverse colostomy method.
Material and Methods: Two sutures of peritoneum were made as “bridges” to support the stoma.
Absorbable sutures were utilized to reinforce the stoma. Once the stoma was created, the stoma bag
was immediately placed on the skin. 120 patients who received conventional or modified transverse
colostomy between 2008 and 2014 were selected. Then, the two groups of patients were compared
for stoma-related complications.
Results: The operation time of stoma construction was 34±10 minutes for the conventional method
and 28±7 minutes for the modified method (P= 0.009). There were no significant differences
between the two groups with respect to postoperative bleeding, bowel obstruction or stoma
retraction. Patients with conventional transverse colostomy were remarkably more likely to
experience parastoma hernia (P= 0.048) and stoma prolapse (P= 0.038).
Conclusion: In comparison with conventional methods, the modified transverse colostomy is a safe
and effective diverting technique. It can be readily performed by all kinds of surgeons, especially
those in underdeveloped areas. The technique represents a preferred method for constructing
temporary stoma in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Keywords:
Colostomy, rectal cancer, chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant, temporary stoma, stoma-related complications.
[1]
Gastinger, I.; Marusch, F.; Steinert, R.; Wolff, S.; Koeckerling, F.; Lippert, H. Working Group ‘Colon/Rectum Carcinoma’. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br. J. Surg., 2005, 92(9), 1137-1142.
[2]
Gu, W.L.; Wu, S.W. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Evidence based on thirteen studies. World J. Surg. Oncol., 2015, 13, 9.
[3]
Harish, K. The loop stoma bridge--a new technique. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 2008, 12(5), 958-961.
[4]
Matthiessen, P.; Hallböök, O.; Rutegård, J.; Simert, G.; Sjödahl, R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: A randomized multicenter trial. Ann. Surg., 2007, 246(2), 207-214.
[5]
Edwards, D.P.; Leppington-Clarke, A.; Sexton, R.; Heald, R.J.; Moran, B.J. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Br. J. Surg., 2001, 88(3), 360-363.
[6]
Hua, H.; Xu, J.; Chen, W.; Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Sheng, Q.; Lin, J. Defunctioning cannula ileostomy after lower anterior resection of rectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(11), 1267-1274.
[7]
Jenkinson, L.R.; Houghton, P.W.; Steele, K.V.; Donaldson, L.A.; Crumplin, M.K. The Biethium bridge--an advance in stoma care. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., 1984, 66(6), 420-422.
[8]
Atkin, G.; Scott, M.A.; Mathur, P.; Mitchell, I.C. The rectus sling to prevent loop colostomy retraction: A case series. Int. Semin. Surg. Oncol., 2005, 2, 22.
[9]
Nunoo-Mensah, J/W.; Chatterjee, A.; Khanwalkar, D.; Nasmyth, D.G. Loop ileostomy: Modification of technique. Surgeon, 2004, 2(5), 287-291.
[10]
Sudhindran, S.; Regunath, K.J. A better bridge for loop stomas. Br. J. Surg., 1996, 83(12), 1797.