On the Measurement of Cooperativity and the Physico-Chemical Meaning of the Hill Coefficient

Page: [861 - 872] Pages: 12

  • * (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Abstract

Cooperative ligand binding is a fundamental property of many biological macromolecules, notably transport proteins, hormone receptors, and enzymes. Positive homotropic cooperativity, the form of cooperativity that has greatest physiological relevance, causes the ligand affinity to increase as ligation proceeds, thus increasing the steepness of the ligand-binding isotherm. The measurement of the extent of cooperativity has proven difficult, and the most commonly employed marker of cooperativity, the Hill coefficient, originates from a structural hypothesis that has long been disproved. However, a wealth of relevant biochemical data has been interpreted using the Hill coefficient and is being used in studies on evolution and comparative physiology. Even a cursory analysis of the pertinent literature shows that several authors tried to derive more sound biochemical information from the Hill coefficient, often unaware of each other. As a result, a perplexing array of equations interpreting the Hill coefficient is available in the literature, each responding to specific simplifications or assumptions. In this work, we summarize and try to order these attempts, and demonstrate that the Hill coefficient (i) provides a minimum estimate of the free energy of interaction, the other parameter used to measure cooperativity, and (ii) bears a robust statistical correlation to the population of incompletely saturated ligation intermediates. Our aim is to critically evaluate the different analyses that have been advanced to provide a physical meaning to the Hill coefficient, and possibly to select the most reliable ones to be used in comparative studies that may make use of the extensive but elusive information available in the literature.

Keywords: Cooperativity, free energy of interaction, allostery, Adair’s equation, two-state model, proteins.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Hill, A.V. The possible effects of aggregation of the molecule of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J. Physiol., 1910, 40(Suppl.), iv-vii.
[2]
Hill, A.V. XLVII. The combinations of haemoglobin with oxygen and with carbon monoxide. Biochem. J., 1913, 7(5), 471-480.
[3]
Wyman, J., Jr Linked functions and reciprocal effects in hemoglobin: a second look. Adv. Protein Chem., 1964, 19, 223-286.
[4]
Wyman, J.; Gill, S.J. Binding and linkage; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, USA, 1990.
[5]
Pauling, L. The oxygen equilibrium of hemoglobin and its structural interpretation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1935, 21(4), 186-191.
[6]
Monod, J.; Wyman, J.; Changeux, J.P. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol., 1965, 12, 88-118.
[7]
Milo, R.; Hou, J.H.; Springer, M.; Brenner, M.P.; Kirschner, M.W. The relationship between evolutionary and physiological variation in hemoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2007, 104(43), 16998-17003.
[8]
Rapp, O.; Yifrach, O. Using the MWC model to describe heterotropic interactions in hemoglobin. PLoS One, 2017, 12(8), e0182871.
[9]
Crick, F.H.; Wyman, J. A footnote on allostery. J. Mol. Biol., 2013, 425(9), 1500-1508.
[10]
Forsén, S.; Linse, S. Cooperativity: over the Hill. Trends Biochem. Sci., 1995, 20(12), 495-497.
[11]
Imai, K. Allosteric effects in haemoglobin; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982.
[12]
Adair, G.S. The hemoglobin system. VI The oxygen dissociation curve of hemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem., 1925, 109, 292-300.
[13]
Poitevin, F.; Edelstein, S.J. Derivation of the Crick-Wyman equation for allosteric proteins defining the difference between the number of binding sites and the Hill coefficient., Erratum in: J Mol Biol. J. Mol. Biol., 2013, 425(9), 1497-1499
[14]
Edelstein, S.J. A novel equation for cooperativity of the allosteric state function. J. Mol. Biol., 2014, 426(1), 39-42.
[15]
Bunn, H.F.; Guidotti, G. Stabilizing interactions in hemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem., 1972, 247(8), 2345-2350.
[16]
Edelstein, S.J. Cooperative interactions of hemoglobin. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1975, 44, 209-232.
[17]
Dahlquist, F.W. The meaning of Scatchard and Hill plots. Methods Enzymol., 1978, 48, 270-299.
[18]
Kegeles, G. The Hill coefficient for a Monod-Wyman-Changeux allosteric system. FEBS Lett., 1979, 103(1), 5-6.
[19]
Zhou, G.; Ho, P.S.; van Holde, K.E. An analytic solution to the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model and all parameters in this model. Biophys. J., 1989, 55(2), 275-280.
[20]
Koshland, D.E., Jr; Némethy, G.; Filmer, D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry, 1966, 5(1), 365-385.
[21]
Bellelli, A.; Carey, J. Reversible ligand binding; Wiley, 2018.
[22]
Ikeda-Saito, M.; Yonetani, T.; Chiancone, E.; Ascoli, F.; Verzili, D.; Antonini, E. Thermodynamic properties of oxygen equilibria of dimeric and tetrameric hemoglobins from Scapharca inaequivalvis. J. Mol. Biol., 1983, 170(4), 1009-1018.
[23]
Bellelli, A. Non allosteric cooperativity in hemoglobin. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2018, 19(6), 573-588.
[24]
Robert, C.H.; Decker, H.; Richey, B.; Gill, S.J.; Wyman, J. Nesting: hierarchies of allosteric interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1987, 84(7), 1891-1895.
[25]
Royer, W.E., Jr; Sharma, H.; Strand, K.; Knapp, J.E.; Bhyravbhatla, B. Lumbricus erythrocruorin at 3.5 A resolution: Architecture of a megadalton respiratory complex. Structure, 2006, 14(7), 1167-1177.