International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control

Author(s): Manash Protim Goswami*, Sudipta Hazarika, Durlove Bora and Utpal Sarma

DOI: 10.2174/2210327909666190409114420

WSN Based Embedded System for Field Parameter Monitoring Inside a Low-Cost Polyhouse

Page: [354 - 367] Pages: 14

  • * (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Abstract

Background & Objective: This paper presents a wireless sensor network for monitoring field parameters inside a low-cost polyhouse. The micro climate inside a polyhouse differs from that on the outside, which provides a favorable condition for unseasonal crops.

Methods: The physical parameters associated with the polyhouse’s microclimate were monitored by a reliable low-cost wireless sensor network, which in turn helps to take decisions for enhancing yield quality and quantity. Sensor network development, signal conditioning, calibration of the soil temperature measurement system and field experience of the installed system are discussed in this paper. The field parameters for the growing period of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) inside the polyhouse are provided in the paper.

Results & Conclusion: It showed significant variations in temperature, relative humidity and wind speed inside the polyhouse to that of the outside. It was also observed that soil temperature, soil moisture in mulched soil differed from that of the open condition. Enhancement of the crop yield was found for mulched soil.

Keywords: Field parameters, microclimate, polyhouse, sensor node, Wireless Sensor Network (WSN), Cucumis sativus.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Li M, Chung SO. Precision agriculture - A worldwide overview. Comput Electron Agric 2002; 36: 113-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00096-0]
[2]
Singh MK. Low cost polyhouse for off-season vegetable cultivation. Rashtriya Krishi 2016; 11(1): 86-6.
[3]
Saikia J, Baruah HK, Phookan DB. Off season production of cucumber inside lowcost polyhouse. Ann Biol 2001; 17(1): 61-4.
[4]
Cheema DS, Kaur P, Kaur S. Off-season cultivation of tomato under net house conditions. Acta Hortic 2004; (659): 177-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.659.21]
[5]
Parvej MR, Khan MAH, Awal MA. Phenological development and production potentials of tomato under poly-house climate. J Agric Sci 2010; 5(1): 19-31.
[6]
Pandey VK, Dwivedi SK, Pandey A, Sharma HG. Low cost polyhouse technology for vegetable cultivation in Chhattisgarh Region. Plant Arch 2004; 4(2): 295-301.
[7]
Kang BS, Sidhu BS. Studies on growing off-season tomato nursery under polyhouse. Ann Agri Bio Res 2005; 10(1): 53-6.
[8]
Kanthaswamy V, Narendra S, Veeraragavathatham D, Srinivasan K, Thiruvudainambi S. Studies on growth and yield of cucumber and sprouting broccoli under polyhouse condition. South Indian Hortic 2000; 48(1/6): 47-52.
[9]
Rangan K, Vigneswaran T. An embedded systems approach to monitor greenhouse. Recent Adv Space Technol Services Climate Change 2010; 2010: 61-5.
[10]
Mirabella O, Brischetto M. A hybrid wired/wireless net-working infrastructure for greenhouse management. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2011; 60(2): 398-407.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2010.2084250]
[11]
Gutiérrez J, Francisco J. Automated irrigation system using a wireless sensor network and GPRS module. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2014; 63(1): 166-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2013.2276487]
[12]
Shukla AJ, Panchal V, Patel S. Intelligent greenhouse design based on Internet of Things (IoT). Int J Emerging Trends Electric Electron 2015; 11(2): 57-61.
[13]
Jonnala P, Sathyanarayana GSR. A wireless sensor network for polyhouse cultivation using zigbee technology. J Eng Appl Sci 2015; 10(10): 4413-8.
[14]
Bhosle S, Sonavane SS. Automated monitoring and controlling of polyhouse environment. Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol 2016; 5(8): 2333-8.
[15]
Datasheet of LM 35. Available at www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm35.pdf
[18]
Datasheet of ECH2O GS1 soil probe. Available at http://publications.decagon. com/Manuals/14640_GS1_Web.pdf
[19]
Datasheet of QS-FS anemometer. Available at https://www.lollette.com/support/pdf/Sensor/QS-FS-en.pdf
[20]
Guo W, Healy WM. Impacts of 2.4-GHz ISM band interference on IEEE 802.15.4 wireless sensor network reliability in buildings. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2012; 61(9): 2533-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2012.2188349]
[21]
Rossi PS, Ciuonzo D, Ekman T. HMM-based decision fusion in wireless sensor networks with noncoherent multiple access. IEEE Commun Lett 2015; 19(5): 871-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2413407]
[22]
Ciuonzo D, Buonanno A, D’Urso M, Palmieri FAN. Distributed classification of multiple moving targets with binary wireless sensor networks. 14th International Conference on Information Fusion IEEE.
[23]
Rossi PS, Ciuonzo D, Kansanen K, Ekman T. Performance analysis of energy detection for MIMO decision fusion in wireless sensor networks over arbitrary fading channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2016; 15(11): 7794-806.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2016.2607703]
[24]
Ciuonzo D, Aubry A, Carotenuto V. Rician MIMO channel and jamming-aware decision fusion. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2017; 65(15): 3866-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2017.2686375]
[25]
Kinney P. ZigBee technology: Wireless control that simply works Communications Design Conference.
[27]
Sarma U, Boruah PK. Design and development of a high precision thermocouple based smart industrial thermometer with on line linearization and data logging feature. Measurement 2010; 43: 1589-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2010.09.003]
[28]
Saikia D, Sarma U, Boruah PK. A sensor network to monitor process parameters of fermentation and drying in black tea production. Mapan J Metrol Soc I 2015; 30(3): 211-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12647-015-0142-4]
[29]
Yadav RK, Kalita P, Choudhary H, Hussain Z, Dev B. Low-cost polyhouse technologies for higher income and nutritional security. Int J Food Sci Tech 2014; 5(3): 191-6.
[30]
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration (guidelines for computing crop water requirements) FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56.