[1]
Kennedy J. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5(4): 321-7.
[2]
Nikfarjam M, Christophi C. Interstitial laser thermotherapy for liver tumours. Br J Surg 2003; 90(9): 1033-47.
[3]
Lismont M, Dreesen L, Wuttke S. Metal-organic framework nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy: current status and perspectives. Adv Funct Mater 2017; 27(14): 1606314.
[4]
Dolmans D, Fukumura D, Jain R. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3(5): 380-7.
[5]
Nesi-Reis V, Lera-Nonose D, Oyama J, et al. Contribution of photodynamic therapy in wound healing: a systematic review. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2018; 21: 294-305.
[6]
Wen X, Li Y, Hamblin MR. Photodynamic therapy in dermatology beyond non-melanoma cancer: An update. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2017; 19: 140-52.
[7]
Bashkatov AN, Genina EA, Kochubey VI, Tuchin VV. Optical properties of human skin, subcutaneous and mucous tissues in the wavelength range from 400 to 2000 nm. J Phys D Appl Phys 2005; 38(15): 2543-55.
[8]
Mironova KE, Proshkina GM, Ryabova AV, et al. Genetically Encoded Immunophotosensitizer 4D5scFv-miniSOG is a Highly Selective Agent for Targeted Photokilling of Tumor Cells in vitro. Theranostics 2013; 3(11): 831-40.
[9]
Grebenik EA, Kostyuk AB, Deyev SM. Upconversion nanoparticles and their hybrid assemblies for biomedical applications. Russ Chem Rev 2016; 85(12): 1277-96.
[10]
Yumita N, Nishigaki R, Umemura K, Umemura SI. Hematoporphyrin as a sensitizer of cell-damaging effect of ultrasound. Jpn J Cancer Res 1989; 80(3): 219-22.
[11]
Yumita NN, Nishigaki R, Umemura K, Umemura S. Synergistic Effect of Ultrasound and Hematoporphyrin on Sarcoma 180. Jpn J Cancer Res 1990; 81(3): 304-8.
[12]
Jin ZH, Miyoshi N, Ishiguro K, et al. Combination effect of photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy on experimental skin squamous cell carcinoma in C3H/HeN mice. J Dermatol 2000; 27(5): 294-306.
[13]
Tserkovsky DA, Alexandrova EN, Chalau VN, Istomin YP. Effects of combined sonodynamic and photodynamic therapies with photolon on a glioma C6 tumor model. Exp Oncol 2012; 34(4): 332-5.
[14]
Sirsi SR, Borden MA. Advances in ultrasound mediated gene therapy using microbubble contrast agents. Theranostics 2012; 2(12): 1208-22.
[15]
Wu Y, Lu CT, Li WF, et al. Preparation and antitumor activity of bFGF-mediated active targeting doxorubicin microbubbles. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013; 39(11): 1712-9.
[16]
Abrahamse H, Hamblin MR. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem J 2016; 473(4): 347-64.
[17]
van Straten D, Mashayekhi V, de Bruijn H, et al. Oncologic photodynamic therapy: basic principles, current clinical status and future directions. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9(2): 19.
[18]
Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2004; 1(4): 279-93.
[19]
Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part two-cellular signaling, cell metabolism and modes of cell death. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2005; 2(1): 1-23.
[20]
Lafond M, Yoshizawa S, Umemura SI. Sonodynamic therapy: advances and challenges in clinical translation. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 1-14.
[21]
Pan X, Wang H, Wang S, et al. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT): a novel strategy for cancer nanotheranostics. Sci China Life Sci 2018; 61(4): 415-26.
[22]
Rengeng L, Qianyu Z, Yuehong L, et al. Sonodynamic therapy, a treatment developing from photodynamic therapy. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2017; 19: 159-66.
[23]
Wang X, Jia Y, Wang P, et al. Current status and future perspectives of sonodynamic therapy in glioma treatment. Ultrason Sonochem 2017; 37: 592-9.
[24]
Liu Y, Wang P, Liu Q, Wang X. Sinoporphyrin sodium triggered sono-photodynamic effects on breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Ultrason Sonochem 2016; 31: 437-48.
[25]
Saito M, Iida T, Nagayama D. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for age-related macular degeneration or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: comparison of the presence of serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92(12): 1642-7.
[26]
Shavkuta BS, Gerasimov MY, Minaev NV, et al. Highly effective 525 nm femtosecond laser crosslinking of collagen and strengthening of a human donor cornea. Laser Phys Lett 2018; 15(1): 015602.
[27]
Robertson CA, Evans DH, Abrahamse H. Photodynamic therapy (PDT): a short review on cellular mechanisms and cancer research applications for PDT. J Photochem Photobiol B 2009; 96(1): 1-8.
[28]
Juzeniene A, Moan J. The history of PDT in Norway Part one: Identification of basic mechanisms of general PDT. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2007; 4(1): 3-11.
[29]
Agostinis PBE, Breyssens H. Regulatory pathways in photodynamic therapy induced apoptosis. In: 10th Congress of the European-Society-for-Photobiology. Vienna, Austria. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2004; 3(8): 721-9.
[30]
Li X, Kolemen S, Yoon J, Akkaya EU. Activatable photosensitizers: agents for selective photodynamic therapy. Adv Funct Mater 2017; 27(5): 1604053.
[31]
Fan W, Huang P, Chen X. Overcoming the Achilles’ heel of photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev 2016; (45): 6488-519.
[32]
Tian J, Zhou J, Shen Z, Ding L, Yu J-S, Ju H. A pH-activatable and aniline-substituted photosensitizer for near-infrared cancer theranostics. Chem Sci 2015; (6): 5969-77.
[33]
Battogtokh GK, Ko YT. Active-targeted pH-responsive albumin-photosensitizer conjugate nanoparticles as theranostic agents. J Mater Chem B 2015; 3(48): 9349-59.
[34]
Cottrell WJ, Paquette AD, Keymel KR, et al. Irradiance-dependent photobleaching and pain in delta-aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy of superficial basal cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2008; (14): 4475-83.
[35]
Foster TH, Murant RS, Bryant RG, Knox RS, Gibson SL, Hilf R. Oxygen consumption and diffusion effects in photodynamic therapy. Radiat Res 1991; 126(3): 296-303.
[36]
Wang W, Moriyama LT, Bagnato VS. Photodynamic therapy induced vascular damage: an overview of experimental PDT. Laser Phys Lett 2013; 10: 023001.
[37]
Sitnik TH. BW. The effect of fluence rate on tumor and normal tissue responses to photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol 1998; 67: 462-6.
[38]
Sitnik TH, Hampton JA, Henderson BW. Reduction of tumour oxygenation during and after photodynamic therapy in vivo: effects of fluence rate. Br J Cancer 1998; 77: 1386-94.
[39]
Song. C. W. SA, Osborn J. L., & Iwata K. Tumour oxygenation is increased by hyperthermia at mild temperatures. Int J Hyperthermia 2009; 25: 91-5.
[40]
Bolfarini GC, Siqueira-Moura MP, Demets GJF, et al. In vitro evaluation of combined hyperthermia and photodynamic effects using magnetoliposomes loaded with cucurbituril zinc phthalocyanine complex on melanoma. J Photochem Photobiol B 2012; 115: 1-4.
[41]
Di Corato R, Béalle G, Kolosnjaj-Tabi J, et al. Combining magnetic hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy for tumor ablation with photoresponsive magnetic liposomes. ACS Nano 2015; 9: 2904-16.
[42]
Matzi V, Maier A, Sankin O, et al. Photodynamic therapy enhanced by hyperbaric oxygenation in palliation of malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical experience. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2004; 1: 57-64.
[43]
Chen Q, Huang Z, Chen H, et al. Improvement of tumor response by manipulation of tumor oxygenation during photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol 2002; 76: 197-203.
[44]
Day RA, Estabrook DA, Logan JK, Sletten EM. Fluorous photosensitizers enhance photodynamic therapy with perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions. Chem Commun (Camb) 2017; 53: 13043-6.
[45]
Cheng Y, Cheng H, Jiang C, et al. Perfluorocarbon nanoparticles enhance reactive oxygen levels and tumour growth inhibition in photodynamic therapy. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8785.
[46]
Clark L, Gollan F. Survival of mammals breathing organic liquids equilibrated with oxygen at atmospheric pressure. Science 1966; 152(3730): 1755-6.
[47]
Castro CI, Briceno JC. Perfluorocarbon-based oxygen carriers: review of products and trials. Artif Organs 2010; 34(8): 622-34.
[48]
Jahr J, Walker V, Manoochehri K. Blood substitutes as pharmacotherapies in clinical practice. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007; 20: 325-30.
[49]
Fingar VHMT, Henderson BW. Modification of photodynamic therapy-induced hypoxia by fluosol-DA (20%) and carbogen breathing in mice. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 3350-4.
[50]
Wang YG, Kim H, Mun S, et al. Indocyanine green-loaded perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions for bimodal (19)F-magnetic resonance/nearinfrared fluorescence imaging and subsequent phototherapy. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2013; 3: 132-40.
[51]
Ren H, Liu J, Su F, et al. Relighting photosensitizers by synergistic integration of albumin and perfluorocarbon for enhanced photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9: 3463-73.
[52]
Sheng D, Liu T, Deng L, et al. Perfluorooctyl bromide & indocyanine green co-loaded nanoliposomes for enhanced multimodal imaging-guided phototherapy. Biomaterials 2018; 165: 1-13.
[53]
Wang J, Liu L, You Q, et al. All-in-one theranostic nanoplatform based on hollow MoSx for photothermally-maneuvered oxygen self-enriched photodynamic therapy. Theranostics 2018; 8: 955-71.
[54]
Song X, Feng L, Liang C, et al. Ultrasound triggered tumor oxygenation with oxygen-shuttle nanoperfluorocarbon to overcome hypoxia-associated resistance in cancer therapies. Nano Lett 2016; 16: 6145-53.
[55]
Chen H, Zhou X, Gao Y, et al. Recent progress in development of new sonosensitizers for sonodynamic cancer therapy. Drug Discov Today 2014; 19: 502-9.
[56]
Tachibana K, Feril Jr L.B., Ikeda-Dantsuji Y. Sonodynamic therapy. Ultrasonics 2008; 48(4): 253-9.
[57]
Rosenthal I, Sostaric JZ, Riesz P. Sonodynamic therapy--a review of the synergistic effects of drugs and ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 2004; 11(6): 349-63.
[58]
Hirschberg H, Madsen S. Synergistic efficacy of ultrasound, sonosensitizers and chemotherapy: a review. Ther Deliv 2017; 8(5): 331-42.
[59]
Chen J, Luo H, Liu Y, et al. Oxygen-self-produced nanoplatform for relieving hypoxia and breaking resistance to sonodynamic treatment of pancreatic cancer. ACS Nano 2017; 11(12): 12849-62.
[60]
Ju D, Yamaguchi F, Zhan G, et al. Hyperthermotherapy enhances antitumor effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated sonodynamic therapy with activation of caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway in human glioma. Tumour Biol 2016; 37: 10415-26.
[61]
Umemura SYN, Nishigaki R, Umemura K. Mechanism of cell damage by ultrasound in combination with hematoporphyrin. Jpn J Cancer Res 1990; 81: 962-6.
[62]
Kessel DJR, Fowlkes JB, Cain C. Porphyrin-induced enhancement of ultrasound cytotoxicity. Int J Radiat Biol 1994; 66: 221-8.
[63]
Tang W, Liu Q, Zhang J, et al. In vitro activation of mitochondria-caspase signaling pathway in sonodynamic therapy-induced apoptosis in sarcoma 180 cells. Ultrasonics 2010; 50: 567-76.
[64]
Li JH, Song DY, Xu YG, et al. In vitro study of haematoporphyrin monomethyl ether-mediated sonodynamic effects on C6 glioma cells. Neurol Sci 2008; 29: 229-35.
[65]
Su X, Wang P, Wang X, et al. Apoptosis of U937 cells induced by hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether-mediated sonodynamic action. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2013; 28: 207-17.
[66]
Feng Q, Zhang W, Yang X, et al. pH/Ultrasound dual-responsive
gas generator for ultrasound imaging-guided therapeutic inertial
cavitation and sonodynamic therapy. Adv Healthc Mater 2017;
7(5): Epub
[67]
Yan S, Lu M, Ding X, et al. HematoPorphyrin monomethyl ether polymer contrast agent for ultrasound/photoacoustic dual-modality imaging-guided synergistic high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 31833.
[68]
Su X, Wang X, Zhang K, et al. Sonodynamic therapy induces apoptosis of human leukemia HL-60 cells in the presence of protoporphyrin IX. Gen Physiol Biophys 2016; 35(2): 155-64.
[69]
Huang P, Qian X, Chen Y, et al. Metalloporphyrin-encapsulated biodegradable nanosystems for highly efficient magnetic resonance imaging-guided sonodynamic cancer therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2017; 139: 1275-84.
[70]
Umemura KY. N; Nishigaki, R; Umemura, Si. Sonodynamically induced antitumor effect of pheophorbide a. Cancer Lett 1996; 102: 151-7.
[71]
Xu ZY, Wang K, Li XQ, et al. The ABCG2 transporter is a key molecular determinant of the efficacy of sonodynamic therapy with Photofrin in glioma stem-like cells. Ultrasonics 2013; 53: 232-8.
[72]
Yumita NNR, Umemura S. Sonodynamically induced antitumor effect of Photofrin II on colon 26 carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2000; 126: 601-6.
[73]
Tachibana K, Kimura N, Okumura M, Eguchi H, Tachibana S. Enhancement of cell killing of HL-60 cells by ultrasound in the presence of the photosensitizing drug Photofrin II. Cancer Lett 1993; 72(3): 195-9.
[74]
Yumita N, Okudaira K, Momose Y, Umemura S. Sonodynamically induced apoptosis and active oxygen generation by gallium-porphyrin complex, ATX-70. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010; 66: 1071-8.
[75]
Umemura Si. Yumita NN, R. Enhancement of ultrasonically induced cell damage by a gallium-porphyrin complex, ATX-70. Jpn J Cancer Res 1993; 84: 582-8.
[76]
Abe HKM, Tachibana K. Targeted sonodynamic therapy of cancer using a photosensitizer conjugated with antibody against carcinoembryonic antigen. Anticancer Res 2002; (22): 1575-80.
[77]
Yumita NNR, Sakata I. Sonodynamically induced antitumor effect of 4-formyloximethylidene-3-hydroxy-2-vinyl-deuterio-porphynyl(IX)-6,7-diaspartic acid (ATX-S10). Jpn J Cancer Res 2000; 91: 255-60.
[78]
Yumita N, Sakata I, Nakajima S, Umemura S. Ultrasonically induced cell damage and active oxygen generation by 4-formyloximeetylidene-3-hydroxyl-2-vinyl-deuterio-porphynyl(IX)-6-7-diaspartic acid: on the mechanism of sonodynamic activation. Biochim Biophys Acta, Gen Subj 2003; 1620(1-3): 179-84.
[79]
Yumita N, Han QS, Kitazumi I, Umemura S. Sonodynamically-induced apoptosis, necrosis, and active oxygen generation by mono-l-aspartyl chlorin e6. Cancer Sci 2008; 99(1): 166-72.
[80]
Yumita N, Iwase Y, Nishi K, et al. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in sonodynamically induced apoptosis using a novel porphyrin derivative. Theranostics 2012; 2(9): 880-8.
[81]
Hachimine K, Shibaguchi H, Kuroki M, et al. Sonodynamic therapy of cancer using a novel porphyrin derivative, DCPH-P-Na(I), which is devoid of photosensitivity. Cancer Sci 2007; 98(6): 916-20.
[82]
Yumita NKK, Sasaki K. Sonodynamic effect of erythrosin B on sarcoma 180 cells in vitro. Ultrason Sonochem 2002; 9: 259-65.
[83]
Umemura SYN, Umemura K, Nishigaki R. Sonodynamically induced effect of rose bengal on isolated sarcoma 180 cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999; 43: 389-93.
[84]
Nonaka M, Yamamoto M, Yoshino S, Umemura S, Sasaki K, Fukushima T. Sonodynamic therapy consisting of focused ultrasound and a photosensitizer causes a selective antitumor effect in a rat intracranial glioma model. Anticancer Res 2009; 29(3): 943-50.
[85]
Sugita N, Kawabata K, Sasaki K, Sakata I, Umemura S. Synthesis of amphiphilic derivatives of rose bengal and their tumor accumulation. Bioconjug Chem 2007; 18(3): 866-73.
[86]
Sugita N, Iwase Y, Yumita N, Ikeda T, Umemura S. Sonodynamically induced cell damage using rose bengal derivative. Anticancer Res 2010; 30(9): 3361-6.
[87]
Chen Z, Li J, Song X, Wang Z, Yue W. Use of a novel sonosensitizer in sonodynamic therapy of U251 glioma cells in vitro. Exp Ther Med 2012; (3): 273-8.
[88]
Sviridov AP, Andreev VG, Ivanova EM, Osminkina LA, Tamarov KP, Timoshenko VYu. Porous silicon nanoparticles as sensitizers for ultrasonic hyperthermia. Appl Phys Lett 2013; 103: 193110.
[89]
Yumita N, Watanabe T, Chen FS, Momose Y, Umemura S. Induction of apoptosis by functionalized fullerene-based sonodynamic therapy in HL-60 cells. Anticancer Res 2016; 36(6): 2665-74.
[90]
Qian J, Gao Q. Sonodynamic therapy mediated by emodin induces the oxidation of microtubules to facilitate the sonodynamic effect. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44(4): 853-60.
[91]
Gao Q, Wang F, Guo S, et al. Sonodynamic effect of an anti-inflammatory agent--emodin on macrophages. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37(9): 1478-85.
[92]
Qian X, Zheng Y, Chen Y. Micro/nanoparticle-augmented sonodynamic therapy (SDT): breaking the depth shallow of photoactivation. Adv Mater 2016; 28(37): 8097-129.
[93]
Harada Y, Ogawa K, Irie Y, et al. Ultrasound activation of TiO2 in melanoma tumors. J Control Release 2011; 149(2): 190-5.
[94]
Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi H, Narita T, et al. Sonodynamic therapy using water-dispersed TiO2-polyethylene glycol compound on glioma cells: comparison of cytotoxic mechanism with photodynamic therapy. Ultrason Sonochem 2011; 18(5): 1197-204.
[95]
Shen S, Wu L, Liu J, et al. Core-shell structured Fe3O4@TiO2-doxorubicin nanoparticles for targeted chemo-sonodynamic therapy of cancer. Int J Pharm 2015; 486(1-2): 380-8.
[96]
Shen S, Guo X, Wu L, et al. Dual-core@shell-structured Fe3O4–NaYF4@TiO2 nanocomposites as a magnetic targeting drug carrier for bioimaging and combined chemo-sonodynamic therapy. J Mater Chem B 2014; 2(35): 5775-84.
[97]
Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, et al. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2014; 72: 49-64.
[98]
Ward M, Wu J, Chiu J-F. Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105(5): 2951-7.
[99]
Lakshmanan S, Gupta GK, Avci P, et al. Physical energy for drug delivery; poration, concentration and activation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2014; 71: 98-114.
[100]
Wu J, Nyborg WL. Ultrasound, cavitation bubbles and their interaction with cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008; 60(10): 1103-16.
[101]
Kooiman K, Foppen-Harteveld M, van der Steen AF, de Jong N. Sonoporation of endothelial cells by vibrating targeted microbubbles. J Control Release 2011; 154(1): 35-41.
[102]
Fan Z, Liu H, Mayer M, Deng CX. Spatiotemporally controlled single cell sonoporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109(41): 16486-91.
[103]
van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, et al. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release 2006; 112(2): 149-55.
[104]
Fan P, Zhang Y, Guo X, et al. Cell-cycle-specific cellular responses to sonoporation. Theranostics 2017; 7(19): 4894-908.
[105]
Hu Y, Wan JM, Yu AC. Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39(12): 2393-405.
[106]
Spurny P, Oberst J, Heinlein D. Photographic observations of Neuschwanstein, a second meteorite from the orbit of the Pribram chondrite. Nature 2003; 423: 151-3.
[107]
Lauterborn W, Kurz T. Physics of bubble oscillations. Rep Prog Phys 2010; 73(10): 106501.
[108]
Allen J, Roy R, Church C. On the role of shear viscosity in mediating inertial cavitation from short-pulse, megahertz-frequency ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1997; 44(4): 743-51.
[109]
Ohl CD, Arora M, Ikink R, et al. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys J 2006; 91(11): 4285-95.
[110]
Prentice P, Cuschieri A, Dholakia K, et al. Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nat Phys 2005; 1: 107-10.
[111]
Nishikawa M, Huang L. Nonviral vectors in the new millennium: delivery barriers in gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther 2001; 12(8): 861-70.
[112]
Lentacker I, De Geest B, Vandenbroucke R, et al. Ultrasound-responsive polymer-coated microbubbles that bind and protect DNA. Langmuir 2006; 22(17): 7273-8.
[113]
Frenkel P, Chen S, Thai T, Shohet RV, Grayburn PA. DNA-loaded albumin microbubbles enhance ultrasound-mediated transfection in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28(6): 817-22.
[114]
Bekeredjian R, Chen S, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV. Augmentation of cardiac protein delivery using ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31(5): 687-91.
[115]
Wilson K, Homan K, Emelianov S. Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging. Nat Commun 2012; 3: 618.
[116]
Teupe C, Richter S, Fisslthaler B, et al. Vascular gene transfer of phosphomimetic endothelial nitric oxide synthase (S1177D) using ultrasound-enhanced destruction of plasmid-loaded microbubbles improves vasoreactivity. Circulation 2002; 105(9): 1104-9.
[117]
Bekeredjian R, Chen S, Frenkel PA, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction can repeatedly direct highly specific plasmid expression to the heart. Circulation 2003; 108(8): 1022-6.
[118]
Haag P, Frauscher F, Gradl J, et al. Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound to deliver an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeting the human androgen receptor into prostate tumours. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2006; 102(1-5): 103-13.
[119]
Christiansen JP, French BA, Klibanov AL, Kaul S, Lindner JR. Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29(12): 1759-67.
[120]
Tinkov S, Coester C, Serba S, et al. New doxorubicin-loaded phospholipid microbubbles for targeted tumor therapy: in vivo characterization. J Control Release 2010; 148(3): 368-72.
[121]
Tinkov S, Winter G, Coester C, Bekeredjian R. New doxorubicin-loaded phospholipid microbubbles for targeted tumor therapy: Part I--Formulation development and in vitro characterization. J Control Release 2010; 143(1): 143-50.
[122]
De Cock I, Lajoinie G, Versluis M, De Smedt SC, Lentacker I. Sonoprinting and the importance of microbubble loading for the ultrasound mediated cellular delivery of nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2016; 83: 294-307.
[123]
Cosgrove D, Harvey C. Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009; 47(8): 813-26.
[124]
Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology 2001; 219(2): 316-33.
[125]
Quaia E. Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol 2007; 17(8): 1995-2008.
[126]
Bartolotta TV, Vernuccio F, Taibbi A, Lagalla R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal liver lesions: where do we stand? Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2016; 37(6): 573-86.
[127]
Wu Q, Wang Y, Li Y, Hu B, He ZY. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in solid thyroid nodules with and without enhancement. Endocrine 2016; 53(2): 480-8.
[128]
Mori N, Mugikura S, Takahashi S, et al. Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in invasive breast cancer: a novel technique to obtain histopathologic information of microvessel density. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43(3): 607-14.
[129]
Porter TR, Xie F. Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3(2): 176-87.
[130]
Hoffmann R, Barletta G, von Bardeleben S, et al. Analysis of left ventricular volumes and function: a multicenter comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cine ventriculography, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27(3): 292-301.
[131]
Madani A, Beletsky V, Tamayo A, Munoz C, Spence JD. High-risk asymptomatic carotid stenosis Ulceration on 3D ultrasound vs. TCD microemboli. Neurology 2011; 77(8): 744-50.
[132]
Eisenbrey JR, Burstein OM, Kambhampati R, Forsberg F, Liu JB, Wheatley MA. Development and optimization of a doxorubicin loaded poly(lactic acid) contrast agent for ultrasound directed drug delivery. J Control Release 2010; 143(1): 38-44.
[133]
Cochran MC, Eisenbrey J, Ouma RO, Soulen M, Wheatley MA. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel loaded microbubbles for ultrasound triggered drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2011; 414(1-2): 161-70.
[134]
Holt RG, Roy RA. Measurements of bubble-enhanced heating from focused, mhz-frequency ultrasound in a tissue-mimicking material. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27(10): 1399-412.
[135]
Watmough DJ, Lakshmi R, Ghezzi F, et al. The effect of gas bubbles on the production of ultrasound hyperthermia at 0.75 MHz: A phantom study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19(3): 231-41.
[136]
Li C, Zhang Y, Li Z, et al. Light-responsive biodegradable nanorattles for cancer theranostics. Adv Mater 2018; 30(8): 1-8.
[137]
Sheikov N, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Jolesz F, Hynynen K. Cellular mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30(7): 979-89.
[138]
Lammers T, Koczera P, Fokong S, et al. Theranostic USPIO-loaded microbubbles for mediating and monitoring blood-brain barrier permeation. Adv Funct Mater 2015; 25(1): 36-43.
[139]
Bleeker H, Shung K, Barnhart J. Ultrasonic characterization of Albunex©, a new contrast agent. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87(4): 1792-7.
[140]
Guvener N, Appold L, de Lorenzi F, et al. Recent advances in ultrasound-based diagnosis and therapy with micro- and nanometer-sized formulations. Methods 2017; 130: 4-13.
[141]
Li H, Yang Y, Zhang M, et al. Acoustic characterization and enhanced ultrasound imaging of long-circulating lipid-coated microbubbles. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37(5): 1243-56.
[142]
Lindner JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004; 3(6): 527-32.
[143]
Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008; 60(10): 1153-66.
[144]
Wang S, Hossack JA, Klibanov AL. Targeting of microbubbles: contrast agents for ultrasound molecular imaging. J Drug Target 2018; 26(5-6): 420-34.
[145]
DeJong N, Hoff L, Skotland T, Bom N. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. Ultrasonics 1992; 30(2): 95-103.
[146]
Hoff L, Sontum PC, Hovem JM. Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: Effect of the encapsulating shell. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107(4): 2272-80.
[147]
Qin S, Ferrara K. A model for the dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128(3): 1511-21.
[148]
Church C. The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(3): 1510-21.
[149]
Guo X, Li Q, Zhang Z, Zhang D. Tu. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 134(2): 1622-31.
[150]
Sheeran PS, Dayton PA. Improving the performance of phase-change perfluorocarbon droplets for medical ultrasonography: current progress, challenges, and prospects. Scientifica (Cairo) 2014; 2014: 579684.
[151]
Sheeran PS, Luois S, Dayton PA, Matsunaga TO. Formulation and acoustic studies of a new phase-shift agent for diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound. Langmuir 2011; 27(17): 10412-20.
[152]
Sheeran PS, Luois SH, Mullin LB, Matsunaga TO, Dayton PA. Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons. Biomaterials 2012; 33(11): 3262-9.
[153]
Sheeran PS, Matsunaga TO, Dayton PA. Phase change events of volatile liquid perfluorocarbon contrast agents produce unique acoustic signatures. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59(2): 379-401.
[154]
Kripfgans OD, Fowlkes JB, Woydt M, Eldevik OP, Carson PL. In vivo droplet vaporization for occlusion therapy and phase aberration correction. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2002; 49(6): 726-38.
[155]
Zhang M, Fabiilli ML, Haworth KJ, et al. Initial investigation of acoustic droplet vaporization for occlusion in canine kidney. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36(10): 1691-703.
[156]
Haworth K, Fowlkes J, Carson P, Kripfgans O. Towards aberration correction of transcranial ultrasound using acoustic droplet vaporization. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34(3): 435-45.
[157]
Huang J, Xu JS, Xu RX. Heat-sensitive microbubbles for intraoperative assessment of cancer ablation margins. Biomaterials 2010; 31(6): 1278-86.
[158]
Kang ST, Lin YC, Yeh CK. Mechanical bioeffects of acoustic droplet vaporization in vessel-mimicking phantoms. Ultrason Sonochem 2014; 21(5): 1866-74.
[159]
Miyoshi N, Kundu SK, Tuziuti T, Yasui K, Shimada I, Ito Y. Combination of Sonodynamic and Photodynamic Therapy against Cancer Would Be Effective through Using a Regulated Size of Nanoparticles. Nanosci Nanoeng 2016; 4(1): 1-11.
[160]
Abd El-Kaream SA, Abd Elsamie GH, Abd-Alkareem AS. Sono-photodynamic modality for cancer treatment using bio-degradable bio-conjugated sonnelux nanocomposite in tumor-bearing mice: Activated cancer therapy using light and ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018; 503(2): 1075-86.
[161]
Wang P, Li C, Wang X, et al. Anti-metastatic and pro-apoptotic effects elicited by combination photodynamic therapy with sonodynamic therapy on breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Ultrason Sonochem 2015; 23: 116-27.
[162]
Wang H, Wang P, Zhang K, Wang X, Liu Q. Changes in cell migration due to the combined effects of sonodynamic therapy and photodynamic therapy on MDA-MB-231 cells. Laser Phys Lett 2015; 12(3): 035603.
[163]
Li Q, Wang X, Wang P, et al. Efficacy of chlorin e6-mediated sono-photodynamic therapy on 4T1 cells. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2014; 29(1): 42-52.
[164]
Chen HJ, Zhou XB, Wang AL, Zheng BY, Yeh CK, Huang JD. Synthesis and biological characterization of novel rose bengal derivatives with improved amphiphilicity for sono-photodynamic therapy. Eur J Med Chem 2018; 145: 86-95.
[165]
Nomikou N, Curtis K, McEwan C, et al. A versatile, stimulus-responsive nanoparticle-based platform for use in both sonodynamic and photodynamic cancer therapy. Acta Biomater 2017; 49: 414-21.
Download PDF Flyer