The Effects of Trees on Soil Chemistry

Page: [35 - 44] Pages: 10

  • * (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Abstract

Background: Trees often affect the chemical properties of soil, positively or negatively.

Objective: This paper studied the effects of Podocarpus falcatus and Markhamia lutea trees on soil chemistry in Ruhande Arboretum, Rwanda.

Methods: Soil samples were collected using Zigzag method from Arboretum forest of Ruhande at different depths (0-20, 20-40 and 40-60 cm). For each plot, 25 samples were collected to make one composite sample per plot for each depth.

Results: The results showed that tree species contributed to the changes of soil chemistry along the depths of the soil layers. The laboratory analyses showed that there was a high significant influence of tree species on soil pH and Aluminum ions. However, it was observed that there was no significant influence of Podocarpus falcatus and Markhamia lutea species on the available phosphorus or on the total exchangeable acidity. On the other hand, analyzing soil samples under Markhamia lutea showed an increase in the total nitrogen and a decrease in the pH and available phosphorus.

Conclusion: Trees affect the chemical properties of soils. Therefore, it is recommended that under acidic soils, for example, forestry and agroforestry actors should use less acidifying tree species, such as Markhamia lutea and Podocarpus falcatus.

Keywords: Rwanda, Podocarpus falcatus, Markhamia lutea, phosphorus, exchangeable acidity, cation exchange capacity.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Mourad KA, Neto JS, Pinto FA, Santos MG. Culture of medicinal plants in the city of Fortaleza as a proposal for the sustainable development of the municipality. Int J Life Sci Eng 2015; 1(4): 177-82.
[2]
World Bank, 2008. Agriculture for development. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/WDR_00_book.pdf (Accessed on February 16, 2018).
[3]
Bizuhoraho T, Kayiranga A, Manirakiza N. The effect of land use systems on soil properties: A case study from Rwanda. Sustain Agric Res 2018; 7(2): 30.
[4]
World Bank, 2017. Rwanda: Year Review - How the Agriculture Sector Fared in 2016. Available from: http://allafrica.com/stories/201701060102.html (Accessed on Jan 6, 2017).
[5]
FAO (2018). Food and Agriculture Organization. Rawanda at a glance. Available from: http://www.fao. org/rwanda/fao-in-rwanda/rwanda-at-a-glance/en/
[6]
REMA (2009). Rwanda Environment Management Authority. Rwanda state of Environment and Outlook Report. Chap III. Land use and agriculture. Available from: http://www.rema.gov.rw/soe/chap3.php
[7]
Arévalo-Gardini E, Canto M, Alegre J, Loli O, Julca A, Baligar V. Changes in soil physical and chemical properties in long term improved natural and traditional agroforestry management systems of cacao genotypes in Peruvian Amazon. PLoS One 2015; 10(7): e0132147.
[8]
Kagabo DM, Stroosnijder L, Visser SM, Moore D. Soil erosion, soil fertility and crop yield on slow-forming terraces in the highlands of Buberuka, Rwanda. Soil Tillage Res 2013; 128: 23-9.
[9]
Nduwayezu JB, Ruffo CK, Minani V, Munyaneza E, Nshutiyayesu S. Know some useful trees and shrubs for agricultural and pastoral communities of Rwanda Institute of Scientific and Technological Research. (IRST): Rwanda 2009.
[10]
Bizuhoraho T, Kayiranga A, Manirakiza N. The Effect of land use systems on soil properties; A case study from Rwanda. Sustain Agric Res 2018; 7(2): 30.
[11]
Ntampaka AG. Effects of Eucalyptus tereticornis, Jacaranda mimosifolia, Cedrela sarrata and Cupressus arizonica trees on soil chemical properties in Ruhande Arboretum. Thesis submitted in Department of Soil and Environment Management, Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Rwanda 2011.
[12]
REMA. Rwanda Environment Management Authority. Economic analysis of natural resource management in Rwanda. The 2010 World Environment Day that was held in Kigali, Rwanda Kigali, Rwanda. Available from: http://rema.gov.rw/rema_doc/pei/Summary%20Economic%20Report,%20Rwanda% 20Oct2010_final.pdf (Accessed on Oct, 2013).
[13]
Mourad KA, Berndtsson R. Grapes as an alternative crop for water saving. In:Cultivation, Varieties and Nutritional Uses. Nova Science Publishers 2012. ISBN: 978-1-62100-016-7.
[14]
Mourad KA, Berndtsson R. Potential water saving from rainwater harvesting in Syria. J Water Manage Res 2011; 67: 113-7.
[15]
Mendonca V, Neto A, Mourad KA. Using rice husks in water purification in Brazil. Int J Environ Plan Manage 2016; 2(3): 15-9.
[16]
Mourad KA, Berndtsson JC, Berndtsson R. Potential fresh water saving using greywater in toilet flushing in Syria. J Environ Manage 2011; 92(10): 2447-53.
[17]
Ayres E, Steltzer H, Berg S, Wallenstein MD, Simmons BL, Wall DH. Tree species traits influence soil physical, chemical, and biological properties in high elevation forests. PLoS One 2009; 4(5): e5964.
[18]
Gao L, Xu H, Bi H, et al. Intercropping competition between apple trees and crops in agroforestry systems on the Loess Plateau of China. PLoS One 2013; 8(7): e70739.
[19]
Guan ZJ, Lu SB, Huo YL, Guan ZP, Liu B, Wei W. Do genetically modified plants affect adversely on soil microbial communities? Agric Ecosyst Environ 2016; 235: 289-305.
[20]
Brady NC, Weil RR. The nature and properties of soils. 9th ed. USA 2016.
[21]
Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total organic and available phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 1945; 59: 39-45.
[22]
Okalebo JR, Gathua KW, Woomer PL. Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis: A Working Manual. 2nd ed. Sacred African Publishers: Nairobi, Kenya 2002.
[23]
Singer MJ, Munns DN. Soils: An introduction. 5th Edition, New Jersey, United nations of America (USA). Prentice Hall, Inc. ISBN13: 9780130278258, 2002.
[24]
Hefner M, Donaldson S, Skelly J. Assessing the soil quality. University of Navada Cooperative Extension. Fact Sheet-09-17. 2009. Available from: https://www. unce.unr.edu/publications/files/nr/2009/f s0917.pdf (Accessed on September, 2017)