Generic placeholder image

Current Analytical Chemistry

Author(s): Zhixia Zhang, Dan Zhao*, Yonghao Pang, Jian Hao, Xincai Xiao and Yan Hu

DOI: 10.2174/1573411014666180320153226

DownloadDownload PDF Flyer Cite As
Application of Silicon Quantum Dots in the Detection of Formaldehyde in Water and Organic Phases

Page: [560 - 566] Pages: 7

  • * (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Abstract

Background: Formaldehyde is widely acknowledged as a carcinogen, but as an important organic reagent, it has also been widely employed in the fields of chemical synthesis, industrial production and biomedicine. It is therefore of great practical significance for the detection of formaldehyde in food, clothing, daily necessities, construction materials and environments.

Methods: The two silicon QDs, that are, DAMO-Si-QDs (with N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl) propyl] ethylenediamine as silicon source) and APTMS-Si-QDs (with (3-Aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane as silicon source) as the fluorescence probe to detect formaldehyde in both water and organic phases.

Results: Silicon QDs prepared by different silicon sources exhibit an obvious difference in their tolerances to the environment and the responses to formaldehyde. However, APTMS-Si-QDs show better selectivity in both water and organic phases. In Tris-HCl solution (20.00mmol•L-1, pH=5), the formaldehyde concentration maintains an excellent linear relationship with the fluorescence intensity of APTMS-Si-QDs in the range of 3.125×10-7-3.125×10-5 mol•L-1, with correlation coefficient R2= 0.9998. In methanol, the formaldehyde concentration maintains an excellent linear relationship with the fluorescence intensity of APTMS-Si-QDs in the range of 1.563×10-7-3.125×10-5 mol•L-1, with correlation coefficient R2= 0.9992.

Conclusion: It is found that DAMO-Si-QDs show poor response to the presence of formaldehyde, while APTMS-Si-QDs got a strong, sensitive and selective response to that in both aqueous and organic phases. In the Tris-HCl buffer (20 mmol•L-1, pH=5), the linear range for formaldehyde detection reaches 3.125×10-7-3.125×10-5 mol•L-1, and for the detection in the organic phase, the linear range reaches 1.563×10-7-3.125×10-5 mol•L-1, in methanol solution. The paper provides a sensitive, selective and simple means for formaldehyde detection in both aqueous and organic phase.

Keywords: Silicon quantum dots, formaldehyde detection, fluorescence, aqueous phase, organic phase, comparison.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Oribayo, O.; Feng, X.; Rempel, G.L.; Pan, Q. Modification of formaldehyde-melamine-sodium bisulfite copolymer foam and its application as effective sorbents for clean up of oil spills. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2017, 160, 384-395.
[2]
Bilal, Y.; Ali, A.; Kaan, K.; Mevlut, A. Simple high‐performance liquid chromatography method for formaldehyde determination in human tissue through derivatization with 2,4‐dinitrophenyl-hydrazine. J. Sep. Sci., 2016, 39, 2963-2969.
[3]
Wang, H.; Ding, J.; Du, X.B.; Sun, X.; Chen, L.G.; Zeng, Q.L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.P.; Zhao, Q.; Ding, L. Determination of formaldehyde in fruit juice based on magnetic strong cation-exchange resin modified with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. Food Chem., 2012, 131, 380-385.
[4]
Yeh, T.S.; Lin, T.C.; Chen, C.C.; Wen, H.M. Analysis of free and bound formaldehyde in squid and squid products by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Food Drug Anal., 2013, 21, 190-197.
[5]
Shimomura, T.; Itoh, T.; Sumiya, T. Electrochemical biosensor for the detection of formaldehyde based on enzyme immobilization in mesoporous silica materials. Sens. Actuators B , 2008, 135, 268-275.
[6]
Nau, P.; Koppmann, J.; Lackner, A.; Brockhinke, A. Detection of formaldehyde in flames using UV and MIR absorption spectroscopy. Z. Phys. Chem.(N F). , 2015, 229, 483-494.
[7]
Zeng, J.B.; Fan, S.G.; Zhao, C.Y. A colorimetric agarose gel for formaldehyde measurement based on nanotechnology involving Tollens reaction. Chem. Commun. , 2014, 50, 8121-8123.
[8]
Ma, P.; Liang, F.; Wang, D.; Yang, Q.; Ding, Y.; Yu, Y.; Gao, D.; Song, D.; Wang, X. Ultrasensitive determination of formaldehyde in environmental waters and food samples after derivatization and using silver nanoparticle assisted SERS. Mikrochim. Acta, 2015, 182, 863-869.
[9]
Gao, F.; Ma, S.Y.; Li, J.; Dai, K.; Xiao, X.C.; Zhao, D.; Gong, W.F. Rational design of high quality citric acid-derived carbon dots by selecting efficient chemical structure motifs. [J]. Carbon, 2017, 112, 131-141.
[10]
Zhang, J.; Yu, S.H. Highly photoluminescent silicon nanocrystals for rapid, label-free and recyclable detection of mercuric ions. Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 4096-4101.
[11]
Zhou, C.H.; Mao, M.; Yuan, H.; Shen, H.B.; Wu, F.; Ma, L.; Li, L.S. Fluorescent QDs-polystyrene composite nanospheres for highly efficient and rapid protein antigen detection. J. Nanopart. Res., 2013, 15, 1-11.
[12]
Zhao, D.; Chan, W.H.; He, Z.K.; Qiu, T. Quantum dot-ruthenium complex dyads: recognition of double-strand DNA through dual-color fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem., 2009, 81, 3537-3543.
[13]
Su, S.; Fan, J.W.; Xue, B.; Wang, L.H. DNA-conjugated quantum dot nanoprobe for high-sensitivity fluorescent detection of DNA and micro-RNA. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 1152-1157.
[14]
Li, Y.; Ma, Q.; Liu, Z.P.; Su, X.G. A novel enzyme-mimic nanosensor based on quantum dot-Au nanoparticle silica mesoporous microsphere for the detection of glucose. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2014, 840, 68-74.
[15]
Yan, P.P.; Zhang, J.; Tang, Q.H.; Li, J.G. A quantum dot based electrochemiluminescent immunosensor for the detection of pg level phenylethanolamine A using gold nanoparticles as substrates and electron transfer accelerators. Analyst , 2014, 139, 4365-4372.
[16]
Ma, Q.; Cui, H.L.; Su, X.G. Highly sensitive gaseous formaldehyde sensor with CdTe quantum dots multilayer films. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2009, 25, 839-844.
[17]
Uchangi, S.A.; Praveena, B. Tunneling of redox enzymes to design nano-probes for monitoring NAD(+) dependent bio-catalytic activity. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2016, 85, 240.
[18]
Uchangi, S.A.; Aaydha, C.V.; Munna, S.T. Quantum dots as nano plug-in’s for efficient NADH resonance energy routing. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2012, 38, 411-415.
[19]
Uchangi, S.A.; Praveena, B. Gold nanoparticle synthesis coupled to fluorescence turn-on for sensitive detection of formaldehyde using formaldehyde dehydrogenase. RSC Advances, 2016, 6, 54777-54784.
[20]
Ryu, J.K.; Cho, B.M.; Woo, H.G.; Cho, S.D.; Sohn, H. Fabrication and characterization of photoluminescent silicon nanoparticles for drug delivery applications. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2013, 13, 157-160.
[21]
Wu, S.C.; Zhong, Y.L.; Zhou, Y.F.; Song, B.; Chu, B.B.; Ji, X.Y.; Wu, Y.Y.; Su, Y.Y.; He, Y. Biomimetic preparation and dual-color bioimaging of fluorescent silicon nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 14726-14732.
[22]
Xu, X.L.; Ma, S.Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, D. The preparation of high-quality water-soluble silicon quantum dots and their application in the detection of formaldehyde. RSC Advances, 2016, 6, 98899-98907.
[23]
Guo, Y.M.; Zhang, L.M.; Cao, F.G.; Song, J.T. Hydrothermal synthesis of blue-emitting silicon quantum dots for fluorescent detection of hypochlorite in tap water. Anal. Methods-UK, 2016, 8, 2723-2728.
[24]
Yi, Y.L.; Zhu, G.B.; Liu, C.; Yao, S.Z. A label-free silicon quantum dots-based photoluminescence sensor for ultrasensitive detection of pesticides. Anal. Chem., 2013, 85, 11464-11470.