Abstract
Background: As a developed technology, microfluidics now offers a great toolkit for handling
and manipulating suspended samples, fluid samples, and particles. A regular chip is different
from a microfluidic chip. A microfluidic chip is made of a series of grooves or microchannels carved
on various materials. This arrangement of microchannels contained within the microfluidic chip is
connected to the outside by inputs and outputs passing through the chip.
Objectives: This review includes the current progress in the field of microfluidic chips, their advantages
and their biomedical applications in diagnosis.
Methods: The various manuscripts were collected in the field of microfluidic chip that have biomedical
applications from the different sources like Pubmed,Science direct and Google Scholar, out of
which some were relevant and considered for the present manuscript.
Results: Microfluidic channels inside the chip allow for the processing of the fluid, such as blending
and physicochemical reactions. Aside from its practical, technological, and physical benefits, microscale
fluidic circuits also improve researchers' capacity to do more accurate quantitative measurements
while researching biological systems. Microfluidic chips, a developing type of biochip, were
primarily focused on miniaturising analytical procedures, especially to enhance analyte separation.
Since then, the procedures for device construction and operation have gotten much simpler.
Conclusion: For bioanalytical operations, microfluidic technology has many advantages. As originally
intended, a micro total analysis system might be built using microfluidic devices to integrate
various functional modules (or operational units) onto a single platform. More researchers were able
to design, produce, and use microfluidic devices because of increased accessibility, which quickly
demonstrated the probability of wide-ranging applicability in all branches of biology.
Graphical Abstract
[48]
Yalikun Y, Tanaka Y. Large scale integration of all glass valveson a microfluidic device. Micromachines 2016; 7.
[65]
Chanmanwar RM, Balasubramaniam R. Wankhade ln. Application and manufacturing of microfluidic devices. Int J Mod Eng Res 2013; 3: 849-56.
[66]
Lei KF. Materials and fabrication techniques for nano-and microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2014; 1-28.
[70]
Waddell EA. Laser ablation as a fabrication technique for microfluidic devices. In: Microfluidic Techniques. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer 2006; pp. 27-38.
[78]
Kim P, Kwon KW, Park MC, Lee SH, Kim SM, Suh KY. Soft lithography for microfluidics: A review. Biochip J. 2008, 2, 1–11.devices. Lab Chip 2015; 15: 2364-78.
[91]
Narimani R, Azizi M, Esmaeili M, Rasta SH, Khosroshahi HT. An optimal method for measuring biomarkers: Colorimetric optical image processing for determination of creatinine concentration using silver nanoparticles. 3 Biotech 2020; 10: 416.
[103]
MA Junping , Lee SM-Y , Yi C , Li C-W . Controllable synthesis of functional nanoparticles by microfluidic platforms for biomedical applications a review. lab a chip 2017; 17209: 26.
[104]
V Arima , G Pascali , O Lade , et al. Radiochemistry on chip: Towards dose-on-demand synthesis of pet radiopharmaceuticals. lab chip 2013; 13: 2328-36.
[105]
Salvador B . Pineda dae, Fernandez-maza I, Corral A, Camacho-leon A, Luque A. Monitoring of microfluidics systems for pet radiopharmaceutical synthesis using integrated silicon photomultipliers. Ieee Sens J 2019; 19: 7702-7.
[106]
Fallahi H, Zhang J, Phan H-p, Nguyen N-t. Flexible microfluidics: Fundamentals, recent developments, and applications. Micromachines 2019; 10: 830.
[107]
solanki S, pandey cm, gupta rk, malhotra bd. Emerging trends in microfluidics-based devices. Biotechnol J 2020; 15: 1900279.
[108]
burklund A, tadimety A, nie Y, hao N, zhang jxj. Chapter one advances in diagnostic microfluidics. Advances in clinical chemistry 2020.
[109]
pulsipher KW, hammer DA, lee D, sehgal CM. Engineering theranostic microbubbles using microfluidics for ultrasound imaging and therapy: A review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 2441-60.