Abstract
Background: Facial electromyography (fEMG) records muscular activities from the facial
muscles, which provides details regarding facial muscle stimulation patterns in experimentation.
Objectives: The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is mostly implemented, whereas the actual or
unprocessed initial fEMG data are rendered into low-spatial units with minimizing the level of data
repetition.
Methods: Facial EMG signal was acquired by using the instrument BIOPAC MP150. Four electrodes
were fixed on the face of each participant for capturing the four different emotions like happiness,
anger, sad and fear. Two electrodes were placed on arm for grounding purposes.
Results: The aim of this research paper is to propagate the functioning of PCA in synchrony with the
subjective fEMG analysis and to give a thorough apprehension of the advanced PCA in the areas of
machine learning. It describes its arithmetical characteristics, while PCA is estimated by implying the
covariance matrix. Datasets which are larger in size are progressively universal and their interpretation
often becomes complex or tough. So, it is necessary to minimize the number of variables and
elucidate linear compositions of the data to explicate it on a huge number of variables with a relevant
approach. Therefore, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied because it is an unsupervised
training method that utilizes advanced statistical concept to minimize the dimensionality of huge datasets.
Conclusion: This work is furthermore inclined toward the analysis of fEMG signals acquired for four
different facial expressions using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to provide clarity on the variation
of features.
Keywords:
Facial EMG, features, principal component analysis, ANOVA, analysis, data recording.
Graphical Abstract
[13]
Maity S, Veer K. A generalized review of human-computer interaction using electromyogram signals. Recent Pat Eng 2023; 17: 16-25.
[14]
Mohod Prakash S, Kalpna C. Face recognition using PCA. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery 2011; 1: 25-8.
[15]
Ebied RM. Feature Extraction using PCA and Kernel-PCA for Face Recognition. The 8th International Conference on Informatics and Systems Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Computing Track 72-7.
[18]
Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum 1983.
[21]
Cheung VC. Central and sensory contributions to the activation and organization of muscle synergies during natural motor behaviors. J Neurosci 2005; 25(27): 6419-34.
[22]
Yuille Alan L, Peter W. Hallinan, David S Cohen. Feature extraction from faces using deformable templates. International journal of computer vision 1992; 8: 99-111.
[23]
Perusquia-Hernandez M, Hirokawa M, Suzuki K. Spontaneous and posed smile recognition based on spatial and temporal patterns of facial EMG. 2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). San Antonio, TX, USA. 2015; pp. 537-41.
[27]
Tresch MC, Cheung VC. Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. J Neurophysiol 2006; 95(4): 2199-212.
[30]
Morrison DF. Multivariate Statistical Methods. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill 1990.
[31]
Diamantaras KI, Kung SY. Principal component neural networks: theory and applications. New York, NY: Wiley 1996.
[32]
Flury B. Common principal components and related models. New York, NY: Wiley 1988.
[34]
Karan V. Spectral and mathematical evaluation of electromyography signals for clinical use. In: International journal of biomathematics. 2016; 9: p. 1650094.
[36]
Cadima J, Jolliffe IT. On relationships between uncentred and column-centred principal component analysis. Pak J Stat 2009; 25: 473-503.
[39]
Obukhov AM. Statistically homogeneous fields on a sphere. Usp Mat Nauk 1947; 2: 196-8.
[40]
Karan Veer. Identification and classification of upper limb motions using PCA. Biomedical Engineering/Biomedizinische Technik 2018; 63: 191-6.
[42]
Lorenz EN. Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather prediction. In: Technical report, Statistical Forecast Project Report. 1956.