Generic placeholder image

Current Nanomaterials

Author(s): Linggao Shi, Ying Huay Cheong, Li Sze Lai*, Swee Pin Yeap and Yin Fong Yeong

DOI: 10.2174/2405461508666230330112404

DownloadDownload PDF Flyer Cite As
Review on the Role of Nanomaterials in Membrane Fabrication via Additive Manufacturing for Gas Separation

Page: [41 - 54] Pages: 14

  • * (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Explore Articles
About Journal
For Authors
For Editors
For Reviewers

Abstract

By virtue of the rapid development of technologies in the era of Industrial Revolution 4.0, additive manufacturing technology enables faster production, diverse raw materials, infinite shapes and geometries for fine products as compared to traditional manufacturing methods. Among many manufacturing materials, nanomaterials have attracted extensive attention due to their wide variety, high strength, and effect of catalytic, quantum, surface and boundary. From the aspect of an industrial manufacturing process, the practical advantages of using additive manufacturing techniques to fabricate nanomaterial-incorporated membranes for gas separation are valuable. This paper reviews the potential of using additive manufacturing in the fabrication of membranes incorporated with nanomaterials for gas separation.

Keywords: Nanomaterials, additive, manufacturing, gas separation, membrane, fabrication.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Abbassian K, Kargari A. Modification of membrane formulation for stabilization of emulsion liquid membrane for extraction of phenol from aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng 2016; 4(4): 3926-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.08.030]
[2]
Majeed H, Svendsen HF. Characterization of aerosol emissions from CO2 capture plants treating various power plant and industrial flue gases. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2018; 74: 282-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.04.016]
[3]
Zhimin H, Zhigang T, Ataeivarjovi E, Dong G, Zhijun Z, Hongwei L. Study on polydimethylsiloxane desorption membrane of CO 2 - Dimethyl carbonate System. Energy Procedia 2017; 118: 210-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.024]
[4]
Brunetti A, Scura F, Barbieri G, Drioli E. Membrane technologies for CO2 separation. J Membr Sci 2010; 359(1-2): 115-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.040]
[5]
Hu L, Cheng J, Li Y, Liu J, Zhou J, Cen K. Amino-functionalized surface modification of polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber-supported poly-dimethylsiloxane membranes. Appl Surf Sci 2017; 413: 27-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.006]
[6]
Shi L, Lai LS, Tay WH, Yeap SP, Yeong YF. Membrane fabrication for carbon dioxide separation: A critical review. ChemBioEng Rev 2022; 9(6): 556-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cben.202200035]
[7]
Qian X, Ravindran T, Lounder SJ, Asatekin A, McCutcheon JR. Printing zwitterionic self-assembled thin film composite membranes: Tuning thickness leads to remarkable permeability for nanofiltration. J Membr Sci 2021; 635: 119428.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119428]
[8]
El-Sayegh S, Romdhane L, Manjikian S. A critical review of 3D printing in construction: Benefits, challenges, and risks. Arch Civ Mech Eng 2020; 20(2): 34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w]
[9]
Yanar N, Liang Y, Yang E, Park H, Son M, Choi H. Electrically polarized graphene-blended spacers for organic fouling reduction in forward osmosis. Membranes 2021; 11(1): 36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes11010036] [PMID: 33406616]
[10]
Sarwar Z, Yousef S, Tatariants M, et al. Fibrous PEBA-graphene nanocomposite filaments and membranes fabricated by extrusion and additive manufacturing. Eur Polym J 2019; 121: 109317.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109317]
[11]
Wang S, Gao H, Jin Y, et al. Defect engineering in novel broad-band gap hexaaluminate MAl12O19 (M=Ca, sr, Ba)-based photocatalysts boosts near ultraviolet and visible light-driven photocatalytic performance. Mater Today Chem 2022; 24: 100942.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.100942]
[12]
Wang S, Li M, Yin Z, et al. Skillfully grafted C O functional group to enhance the adsorption/photocatalytic mechanism of YMnO3/MgAl2O4 heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv Powder Technol 2022; 33(11): 103771.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2022.103771]
[13]
Wang S, Chen X, Fang L, et al. Double heterojunction CQDs/CeO2/BaFe12O19 magnetic separation photocatalysts: Construction, structural characterization, dye and POPs removal, and the interrelationships between magnetism and photocatalysis. Nuclear Analysis 2022; 1(3): 100026.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucana.2022.100026]
[14]
Georgantzinos SK, Giannopoulos GI, Bakalis PA. Additive manufacturing for effective smart structures: The idea of 6D printing. J Com-posit Sci 2021; 5(5): 119.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcs5050119]
[15]
Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2007; 2(4): MR17-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.2815690] [PMID: 20419892]
[16]
Saleh TA. Nanomaterials: Classification, properties, and environmental toxicities. Environ Technol Innov 2020; 20: 101067.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101067]
[17]
Stone V, Nowack B, Baun A, et al. Nanomaterials for environmental studies: Classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408(7): 1745-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.035] [PMID: 19903569]
[18]
Sudha PN, Sangeetha K, Vijayalakshmi K, et al. Nanomaterials history, classification, unique properties, production and market.In: Emerging applications of nanoparticles and architecture nano- structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2018; pp. 341-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-51254-1.00012-9]
[19]
Buzea C, Pacheco I. Nanomaterials and their classification.In EMR/ESR/EPR spectroscopy for characterization of nanomaterials. Berlin: Springer 2017; pp. 3-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3655-9_1]
[20]
Rizwan M, Shoukat A, Ayub A, et al. Types and classification of nanomaterials.In Synthesis, Characterization, Hazards and Safety. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2021; pp. 31-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823823-3.00001-X]
[21]
Trotta F, Mele A. Nanomaterials: Classification and properties, nanosponges: Synthesis and applications. (1st ed.), London: Wiley 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9783527341009]
[22]
Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS, Dufresne A, Danquah MK. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: History, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2018; 9: 1050-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.98] [PMID: 29719757]
[23]
Pacheco MJ, Vences LJ, Moreno H, Pacheco JO, Valdivia R, Hernández C. Review: Mixed-matrix membranes with CNT for CO2 separa-tion processes. Membranes 2021; 11(6): 457.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060457] [PMID: 34205664]
[24]
Ali A, Pothu R, Siyal SH, Phulpoto S, Sajjad M, Thebo KH. Graphene-based membranes for CO2 separation. Mater Sci Energy Technol 2019; 2(1): 83-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2018.11.002]
[25]
Yan L, Liu C, Xia J, et al. CNTs/TiO2 composite membrane with adaptable wettability for on-demand oil/water separation. J Clean Prod 2020; 275: 124011.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124011]
[26]
Du C, Wang Z, Liu G, Wang W, Yu D. One-step electrospinning PVDF/PVP-TiO2 hydrophilic nanofiber membrane with strong oil-water separation and anti-fouling property. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2021; 624: 126790.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126790]
[27]
Zhao Y, Tian H, Ouyang Y, et al. Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) composite membrane with polyamidoamine dendrimers for efficient separation of CO2/H2 and CO2/N2. J Polym Environ 2022; 30(10): 4193-200.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10924-022-02491-5]
[28]
Cui Y, Li B, He H, Zhou W, Chen B, Qian G. Metal–Organic frameworks as platforms for functional materials. Acc Chem Res 2016; 49(3): 483-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00530] [PMID: 26878085]
[29]
Yaghi OM, Li G, Li H. Selective binding and removal of guests in a microporous metal–organic framework. Nature 1995; 378(6558): 703-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/378703a0]
[30]
Feng L, Wang KY, Day GS, Ryder MR, Zhou HC. Destruction of metal–organic frameworks: Positive and negative aspects of stability and lability. Chem Rev 2020; 120(23): 13087-133.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00722] [PMID: 33049142]
[31]
Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013; 341(6149): 1230444.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230444] [PMID: 23990564]
[32]
Hou CC, Xu Q. Metal–organic frameworks for energy. Adv Energy Mater 2019; 9(23): 1801307.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201801307]
[33]
Mazari SA, Ali E, Abro R, et al. Nanomaterials: Applications, waste-handling, environmental toxicities, and future challenges – A review. J Environ Chem Eng 2021; 9(2): 105028.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105028]
[34]
Peng Z, Liu X, Zhang W, et al. Advances in the application, toxicity and degradation of carbon nanomaterials in environment: A review. Environ Int 2020; 134: 105298.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105298] [PMID: 31765863]
[35]
Parashar M, Shukla VK, Singh R. Metal oxides nanoparticles via sol–gel method: A review on synthesis, characterization and applica-tions. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2020; 31(5): 3729-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-02994-8]
[36]
Li Z, Hou B, Xu Y, et al. Comparative study of sol–gel-hydrothermal and sol–gel synthesis of titania–silica composite nanoparticles. J Solid State Chem 2005; 178(5): 1395-405.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2004.12.034]
[37]
Liu H, Wang S, Gao H, et al. A simple polyacrylamide gel route for the synthesis of MgAl2O4 nanoparticles with different metal sources as an efficient adsorbent: Neural network algorithm simulation, equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. Separ Purif Tech 2022; 281: 119855.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119855]
[38]
Feng X, Yang Z, Chmely S, Wang Q, Wang S, Xie Y. Lignin-coated cellulose nanocrystal filled methacrylate composites prepared via 3D stereolithography printing: Mechanical reinforcement and thermal stabilization. Carbohydr Polym 2017; 169: 272-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.001] [PMID: 28504146]
[39]
Chen Q, Mangadlao JD, Wallat J, De Leon A, Pokorski JK, Advincula RC. 3D printing biocompatible polyurethane/poly (lactic ac-id)/graphene oxide nanocomposites: Anisotropic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9(4): 4015-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11793] [PMID: 28026926]
[40]
V.S. Abhisha, V.P. Swapna, R. Stephen. Transport properties of polymeric membranes. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2017.
[41]
Zhang J, Schott JA, Mahurin SM, Dai S. Porous structure design of polymeric membranes for gas separation. Small Methods 2017; 1(5): 1600051.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201600051]
[42]
Rezakazemi M, Younas M. Membrane Contactor Technology: Water Treatment, Food Processing, Gas Separation, and Carbon Capture. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons 2021.
[43]
Ismail AF, Khulbe KC, Matsuura T. Gas Separation Membranes. Berlin: Springer 2015; pp. 37-192.
[44]
Sethu Lakshmi MB, Francis B. Transport properties of polymeric membranes. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2018; pp. 349-61.
[45]
Freeman B, Yampolskii Y. Membrane gas separation. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons 2011.
[46]
Lalia BS, Kochkodan V, Hashaikeh R, Hilal N. A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship. Desalination 2013; 326: 77-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.016]
[47]
Kahrs C, Schwellenbach J. Membrane formation via non-solvent induced phase separation using sustainable solvents: A comparative study. Polymer 2020; 186: 122071.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.122071]
[48]
Tan X, Rodrigue D. A review on porous polymeric membrane preparation. Part I: Production techniques with polysulfone and poly (vi-nylidene fluoride). Polymers 2019; 11(7): 1160.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11071160] [PMID: 31288433]
[49]
Ismail N, Venault A, Mikkola JP, Bouyer D, Drioli E, Tavajohi Hassan Kiadeh N. Investigating the potential of membranes formed by the vapor induced phase separation process. J Membr Sci 2020; 597: 117601.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117601]
[50]
Raaijmakers MJT, Benes NE. Current trends in interfacial polymerization chemistry. Prog Polym Sci 2016; 63: 86-142.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.06.004]
[51]
Song Y, Fan JB, Wang S. Recent progress in interfacial polymerization. Mater Chem Front 2017; 1(6): 1028-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6QM00325G]
[52]
Wang L, Yang G, Peng S, Wang J, Yan W, Ramakrishna S. One-dimensional nanomaterials toward electrochemical sodium-ion storage applications via electrospinning. Energy Storage Mater 2020; 25: 443-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.036]
[53]
Lu X, Wang C, Wei Y. One-dimensional composite nanomaterials: Synthesis by electrospinning and their applications. Small 2009; 5(21): 2349-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.200900445] [PMID: 19771565]
[54]
Yuan S, Strobbe D, Kruth JP, Van Puyvelde P, Van der Bruggen B. Production of polyamide-12 membranes for microfiltration through selective laser sintering. J Membr Sci 2017; 525: 157-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.041]
[55]
Ray SS, Dommati H, Wang JC, Chen S-S. Solvent based slurry stereolithography 3D printed hydrophilic ceramic membrane for ultrafiltration application. Ceram Int (Part B) 2020; 46(8): 12480-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.010]
[56]
Mustapha KB, Metwalli KM. A review of fused deposition modelling for 3D printing of smart polymeric materials and composites. Eur Polym J 2021; 156: 110591.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110591]
[57]
Qian X, Ostwal M, Asatekin A, et al. A critical review and commentary on recent progress of additive manufacturing and its impact on membrane technology. J Membr Sci 2022; 645: 120041.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120041]
[58]
Kafle A, Luis E, Silwal R, Pan HM, Shrestha PL, Bastola AK. 3D/4D Printing of polymers: Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), and Stereolithography (SLA). Polymers 2021; 13(18): 3101.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13183101] [PMID: 34578002]
[59]
Low ZX, Chua YT, Ray BM, Mattia D, Metcalfe IS, Patterson DA. Perspective on 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to related unconventional fabrication techniques. J Membr Sci 2017; 523: 596-613.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.006]
[60]
Pereira GG, Figueiredo S, Fernandes AI, Pinto JF. Polymer selection for hot-melt extrusion coupled to fused deposition modelling in pharmaceutics. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12(9): 795.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12090795] [PMID: 32842703]
[61]
Koo JW, Ho JS, An J, Zhang Y, Chua CK, Chong TH. A review on spacers and membranes: Conventional or hybrid additive manufactur-ing. Water Res 2021; 188: 116497.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116497] [PMID: 33075598]
[62]
T. Sathies, P. Senthil, M. Anoop. A review on advancements in applications of fused deposition modelling process. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2020; 26(4): 669-87.
[63]
Mohan N, Senthil P, Vinodh S, Jayanth N. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposi-tion modelling process. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2017; 12(1): 47-59.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490]
[64]
Vyavahare S, Teraiya S, Panghal D, Kumar S. Fused deposition modelling: A review. Rapid Prototyping J 2020; 26(1): 176-201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0106]
[65]
Mwema FM, Akinlabi ET. Fused deposition modeling: Strategies for quality enhancement. New York, USA: Springer Nature 2020.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48259-6]
[66]
Baca Lopez DM, Ahmad R. Tensile mechanical behaviour of multi-polymer sandwich structures via fused deposition modelling. Polymers 2020; 12(3): 651.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12030651] [PMID: 32178343]
[67]
Liu Z, Wang Y, Shi J. Tensile performance of fused deposition modeling PA 6 polymer composites with nanoparticle reinforcement and/or continuous fiber reinforcement. J Micro Nano-Manufact 2019; 7(4): 041001.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4044913]
[68]
Wu H, Chen P, Yan C, Cai C, Shi Y. Four-dimensional printing of a novel acrylate-based shape memory polymer using digital light pro-cessing. Mater Des 2019; 171: 107704.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107704]
[69]
Wang CC, Chen JY, Wang J. The selection of photoinitiators for photopolymerization of biodegradable polymers and its application in digital light processing additive manufacturing. J Biomed Mater Res A 2022; 110(1): 204-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37277] [PMID: 34397160]
[70]
Patel DK, Sakhaei AH, Layani M, Zhang B, Ge Q, Magdassi S. Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv Mater 2017; 29(15): 1606000.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606000] [PMID: 28169466]
[71]
Clarissa WH-Y, Chia CH, Zakaria S, et al. Recent advancement in 3-D printing: Nanocomposites with added functionality. Prog Addit Manufact 2021; pp. 1-26.
[72]
Ko H, Yi H, Jeong HE. Wall and ceiling climbing quadruped robot with superior water repellency manufactured using 3D printing (uni-climb). Int J Precis Engin Manufact-Green Technol 2017; 4(3): 273-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0033-y]
[73]
Gu H, Li G, Li P, et al. Superhydrophobic and breathable SiO2/polyurethane porous membrane for durable water repellent application and oil-water separation. Appl Surf Sci 2020; 512: 144837.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144837]
[74]
Pezzana L, Riccucci G, Spriano S, Battegazzore D, Sangermano M, Chiappone A. 3D printing of pdms-like polymer nanocomposites with enhanced thermal conductivity: Boron nitride based photocuring system. Nanomaterials 2021; 11(2): 373.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11020373] [PMID: 33540598]
[75]
Kim H, Johnson J, Chavez LA, Garcia Rosales CA, Tseng T-LB, Lin Y. Enhanced dielectric properties of three phase dielectric MWCNTs/BaTiO3/PVDF nanocomposites for energy storage using fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Ceram Int 2018; 44(8): 9037-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.107]
[76]
Fielding G, Bose S. SiO2 and ZnO dopants in three-dimensionally printed tricalcium phosphate bone tissue engineering scaffolds en-hance osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Acta Biomater 2013; 9(11): 9137-48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.009] [PMID: 23871941]
[77]
Roopavath UK, Soni R, Mahanta U, Deshpande AS, Rath SN. 3D printable SiO 2 nanoparticle ink for patient specific bone regeneration. RSC Advances 2019; 9(41): 23832-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9RA03641E] [PMID: 35530605]
[78]
Wang L, Ni X. The effect of the inorganic nanomaterials on the UV-absorption, rheological and mechanical properties of the rapid proto-typing epoxy-based composites. Polym Bull 2017; 74(6): 2063-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00289-016-1825-x]
[79]
Xiong H, Liu Z, Chen X, et al. In situ imaging of the sorption-induced subcell topological flexibility of a rigid zeolite framework. Science 2022; 376(6592): 491-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7667] [PMID: 35482872]
[80]
Li P, Wang Z, Qiao Z, et al. Recent developments in membranes for efficient hydrogen purification. J Membr Sci 2015; 495: 130-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.010]
[81]
V.S. Abhisha, V.P. Swapna, R. Stephen. Transport properties of polymeric membranes. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2017; pp. 391-423.
[82]
Ismail AF, Salleh WNW, Yusof N. Synthetic polymeric membranes for advanced water treatment, gas separation, and energy sustainabil-ity. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2020.
[83]
Tavakoli A, Rahimi K, Saghandali F, Scott J, Lovell E. Nanofluid preparation, stability and performance for CO2 absorption and desorp-tion enhancement: A review. J Environ Manage 2022; 313: 114955.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114955] [PMID: 35405543]
[84]
Wang JG, Hu B, Wu D, Dou F, Wang X. A multiscale fractal transport model with multilayer sorption and effective porosity effects. Transp Porous Media 2019; 129(1): 25-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-019-01276-0]
[85]
Lei L, Pan F, Lindbråthen A, et al. Carbon hollow fiber membranes for a molecular sieve with precise-cutoff ultramicropores for superi-or hydrogen separation. Nat Commun 2021; 12(1): 268.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20628-9] [PMID: 33431865]
[86]
Zainuddin M I F, Ahmad A L. Mixed matrix membrane development progress and prospect of using 2D nanosheet filler for CO2 separation and capture. J CO2 Utilization 2022; 62: 102094.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102094]
[87]
Kim S, Lee YM. High performance polymer membranes for CO2 separation. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2013; 2(2): 238-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2013.03.006]
[88]
Schakel W, Orregioni G, Strømman A, Ramirez A. Impact of fuel selection on techno-environmental performance of post-combustion calcium looping process applied to a cement plant. Energy Procedia 2017; 114: 6215-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1759]
[89]
Ji Y, Zhang M, Guan K, Zhao J, Liu G, Jin W. High‐performance CO2 capture through polymer‐based ultrathin membranes. Adv Funct Mater 2019; 29(33): 1900735.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900735]
[90]
Ansari A, Navarchian AH, Rajati H. Permselectivity improvement of PEBAX ® 2533 membrane by addition of glassy polymers (Matri-mid® and polystyrene) for CO2/N2 separation. J Appl Polym Sci 2022; 139(4): 51556.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.51556]
[91]
Li P, Chen HZ, Chung TS. The effects of substrate characteristics and pre-wetting agents on PAN–PDMS composite hollow fiber mem-branes for CO2/N2 and O2/N2 separation. J Membr Sci 2013; 434: 18-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.042]
[92]
Hu L, Cheng J, Li Y, Liu J, Zhou J, Cen K. In-situ grafting to improve polarity of polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber-supported polydime-thylsiloxane membranes for CO2 separation. J Colloid Interface Sci 2018; 510: 12-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.048] [PMID: 28926724]
[93]
Jue ML, Breedveld V, Lively RP. Defect-free PIM-1 hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 2017; 530: 33-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.012]
[94]
Althumayri K, Harrison WJ, Shin Y, et al. The influence of few-layer graphene on the gas permeability of the high-free-volume polymer PIM-1. Philos Trans- Royal Soc, Math Phys Eng Sci 2016; 374(2060): 20150031.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0031] [PMID: 26712643]
[95]
Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E. Additive manufacturing in construction: A review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods. Addit Manuf 2019; 30: 100894.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100894]
[96]
Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applica-tions and challenges. Compos, Part B Eng 2018; 143: 172-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012]
[97]
Parandoush P, Lin D. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct 2017; 182: 36-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088]
[98]
Tijing LD, Dizon JRC, Ibrahim I, Nisay ARN, Shon HK, Advincula RC. 3D printing for membrane separation, desalination and water treatment. Appl Mater Today 2020; 18: 100486.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100486]
[99]
Wen Y, Xun S, Haoye M, et al. 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A review. Biomater Sci 2017; 5(9): 1690-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00315C] [PMID: 28686244]
[100]
Gumrah Dumanli A. Nanocellulose and its composites for biomedical applications. Curr Med Chem 2017; 24(5): 512-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867323666161014124008] [PMID: 27758719]
[101]
Worawit C, Cocovi-Solberg DJ, Varanusupakul P, Miró M. In-line carbon nanofiber reinforced hollow fiber-mediated liquid phase mi-croextraction using a 3D printed extraction platform as a front end to liquid chromatography for automatic sample preparation and anal-ysis: A proof of concept study. Talanta 2018; 185: 611-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.04.007] [PMID: 29759249]
[102]
Cao M, Gu F, Rao C, Fu J, Zhao P. Improving the electrospinning process of fabricating nanofibrous membranes to filter PM2.5. Sci Total Environ 2019; 666: 1011-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.207] [PMID: 30970468]