Generic placeholder image

Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering

Author(s): Zhiying Ji, Zhuo Chen and Jun Chen*

DOI: 10.2174/2212797616666230127143158

DownloadDownload PDF Flyer Cite As
Peer Effect on Environmental Information Disclosure: Evidence from High-polluting Industries in China

Page: [102 - 117] Pages: 16

  • * (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Explore Articles
About Journal
For Authors
For Editors
For Reviewers

Abstract

Background: Among the research on the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure, scholars rarely identify the factors from the perspective of the enterprise’s external environment, especially peer enterprise behavior. In fact, the disclosure of environmental information by most enterprises in China is still only voluntary, and the form of disclosure is so chaotic that it is easy to be influenced by other enterprises.

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether a firm's EID is affected by peer firms and contribute to the existing literature on the influencing factors of EID

Methods: An analytical framework incorporating the herd behavior hypothesis, the legitimate theory, and the stakeholder theory is constructed, and fixed effect estimation, as well as a two-stage least square, is used to test the hypotheses.

Results: There is a peer effect on environmental information disclosure of high-polluting firms. It has been observed that the focal firm imitates the disclosure behavior of small peer firms more than the large peer firms. Moreover, a peer effect of environmental disclosure on sensitive and non-sensitive information is also reported, but the peer effect on sensitive information is larger than that on nonsensitive information.

Conclusion: First, policymakers need to realize that there is a peer effect involved in EID among highpolluting firms and improve the binding force of environmental regulations. Second, there are “demonstration effects” involved in EID. In the practice of regulations on disclosure, the smaller firms need to be under stricter scrutiny and set as models of EID to improve the efficiency of supervision and regulation. Third, enterprises have a stronger peer effect on the disclosure of sensitive information. Governments should strengthen the supervision of sensitive information disclosure.

Keywords: Peer effect, environmental information disclosure, high-polluting industries, herd behavior hypothesis, legitimate theory, stakeholder theory.

[1]
Lu Y, Abeysekera I. Stakeholders’ power, corporate characteristics, and social and environmental disclosure: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 2014; 64: 426-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.005]
[2]
Yin J, Wang S. The effects of corporate environmental disclosure on environmental innovation from stakeholder perspectives. Appl Econ 2018; 50(8): 905-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1346362]
[3]
Ji Z. Does factor market distortion affect industrial pollution intensity? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 2020; 267122136.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122136]
[4]
Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Account Organ Soc 2008; 33(4-5): 303-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003]
[5]
Meng XH, Zeng SX, Shi JJ, Qi GY, Zhang ZB. The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China. J Environ Manage 2014; 145: 357-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.009] [PMID: 25113230]
[6]
Chen X, Li X, Huang X. The impact of corporate characteristics and external pressure on environmental information disclosure: a model using environmental management as a mediator. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020; 29(9): 12797-809.
[PMID: 33175350]
[7]
Meng XH, Zeng SX, Tam CM, Xu XD. Whether top executives’ turnover influences environmental responsibility: from the perspective of environmental information disclosure. J Bus Ethics 2013; 114(2): 341-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1351-1]
[8]
Gordon EA, Hsu HT, Huang H, Peer R&D. disclosure and corporate innovation: Evidence from American depositary receipt firms. Adv Account 2020; 49: 100471.
[9]
Manski CF. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 1993; 60(3): 531-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2298123]
[10]
Duong HK, Ngo AD, McGowan CB. Industry peer effect and the maturity structure of corporate debt. Manag Finance 2015; 41(7): 714-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MF-02-2014-0050]
[11]
Grennan J. Dividend payments as a response to peer influence. J Financ Econ 2019; 131(3): 549-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.012]
[12]
Guthrie J, Parker LD. Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Account Bus Res 1989; 19(76): 343-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863]
[13]
Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Account Audit Amp Account J. 1995. INCOMPLETE
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996]
[14]
Huang CL, Kung FH. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 2010; 96(3): 435-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3]
[15]
Cormier D, Magnan M. Environmental reporting management: a continental European perspective. Artif Intell Law 2003; 13: 75-92.
[16]
Cormier D, Magnan M. The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors’ valuation of a firm’s earnings: An international perspective. Ecol Econ 2007; 62(3-4): 613-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.030]
[17]
Elijido-Ten E. Determinants of environmental disclosures in a developing country: an application of the stakeholder theory. In: Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference. 2004; p. 4.
[18]
Wu D, Zhu S. The peer effect of corporate environmental disclosure. Forecasting 2021; 40: 8.
[19]
Seo H. Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions. J Account Econ 2021; 71(1): 101364.
[20]
Leary MT, Roberts MR. Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? In: Soc Sci Electron Publ. 2010.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1623379]
[21]
Ji Z, Yu X, Yang J. Environmental information disclosure in capital raising. Aust Econ Pap 2020; 59(3): 183-214.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12176]
[22]
Chang Y, Du X, Zeng Q. Does environmental information disclosure mitigate corporate risk? Evidence from China. J Contemp Account Econ 2021; 17(1): 100239.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100239]
[23]
Huang R, Chen D. Does environmental information disclosure benefit waste discharge reduction? Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 2015; 129(3): 535-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2173-0]
[24]
Pan D, Fan W. Benefits of environmental information disclosure in managing water pollution: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021; 28(12): 14764-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11659-2] [PMID: 33216303]
[25]
Wegener M, Elayan FA, Felton S, Li J. Factors influencing corporate environmental disclosures. Account Perspect 2007. INCOMPLETE
[26]
Jacoby G, Liu M, Wang Y, Wu Z, Zhang Y. Corporate governance, external control, and environmental information transparency: Evidence from emerging markets. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 2019; 58: 269-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.11.015]
[27]
Cheng Z, Wang F, Keung C, Bai Y. Will corporate political connection influence the environmental information disclosure level? based on the panel data of a-shares from listed companies in shanghai stock market. J Bus Ethics 2017; 143(1): 209-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2776-0]
[28]
Wei Y, He W. Can anti-corruption improve the quality of environmental information disclosure? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022; 29: 5345-59.
[29]
Agyemang AO, Yusheng K, Ayamba EC, Twum AK, Chengpeng Z, Shaibu A. Impact of board characteristics on environmental disclosures for listed mining companies in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020; 27(17): 21188-201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08599-2] [PMID: 32266625]
[30]
Scharfstein DS, Stein JC. Herd behavior and investment. Am Econ Rev 1990; 80(3): 465-79.
[31]
Mensah YM, Yang R. An empirical evaluation of analysts’ herding behavior following Regulation Fair Disclosure. J Account Public Policy 2008; 27(4): 317-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.06.003]
[32]
Arya A, Mittendorf B. Using disclosure to influence herd behavior and alter competition. J Account Econ 2005; 40(1-3): 231-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.07.001]
[33]
Jiang Y, Zheng Y. A study of isomorphism of listed companies’ CSR information disclosure under the influence of herd behavior. J Contemp Finance Econ 2015; 12: 109-17.
[34]
Wang G, Seibert SE. The impact of leader emotion display frequency on follower performance: Leader surface acting and mean emotion display as boundary conditions. Leadersh Q 2015; 26(4): 577-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.007]
[35]
Blazsek S, Escribano A. Patent propensity, R&D and market competition: Dynamic spillovers of innovation leaders and followers. J Econom 2016; 191(1): 145-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.10.005]
[36]
Erez A, Misangyi VF, Johnson DE, LePine MA, Halverson KC. Stirring the hearts of followers: Charismatic leadership as the transferal of affect. J Appl Psychol 2008; 93(3): 602-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.602] [PMID: 18457489]
[37]
de Villiers C, van Staden CJ. Shareholders’ requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross country comparison. Br Account Rev 2010; 42(4): 227-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.08.002]
[38]
Lindblom CE. Modes of inquiry. J Public Adm Res Theory J-Part 1994; 4: 327-41.
[39]
Hooks J, van Staden CJ. Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures. Br Account Rev 2011; 43(3): 200-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2011.06.005]
[40]
Pae S. Selective disclosures in the presence of uncertainty about information endowment. J Account Econ 2005; 39(3): 383-409.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.002]
[41]
Nelson J, Gallery G, Percy M. Role of corporate governance in mitigating the selective disclosure of executive stock option information. Account Finance 2010; 50(3): 685-717.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00339.x]
[42]
Anchada Charoenrook, Craig M, Lewis . Information, selective disclosure, and analyst behavior. Financ Manag 2009; 38: 39-57.
[43]
Liu X, Anbumozhi V. Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. J Clean Prod 2009; 17(6): 593-600.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.001]
[44]
Donaldson T, Preston LE. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manage Rev 1995; 20(1): 65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258887]
[45]
Manzaneque-Lizano, Alfaro-Cortés. Stakeholders and long-term sustainability of smes. who really matters in crisis contexts, and when. Sustainability 2019; 11(23): 6551.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11236551]
[46]
Hughes SB, Anderson A, Golden S. Corporate environmental disclosures: are they useful in determining environmental performance? 2001; 20: 0-240.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00031-X]
[47]
Cho CH, Patten DM. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Account Organ Soc 2007; 32(7-8): 639-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009]
[48]
Xz A, Cw AShB. Impacts of market segmentation on the over-capacity of the thermal electricity generation industry in China. J Environ Manage 2021; 279: 11176.
[49]
Zhou KZ, Wang K, Xu D, Xie E. Drinking poison to quench thirst: Does bribery foster firm performance in China? J Bus Res 2022; 147: 505-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.038]
[50]
Chen YW, Chan K, Chang Y. Peer effects on corporate cash holdings. Int Rev Econ Finance 2019; 61: 213-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.02.008]
[51]
Gormley TA, Matsa DA. Common errors: how to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. Rev Financ Stud 2014; 27(2): 617-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht047]
[52]
Lee BS, Peng J, Li G, He J. Regional economic disparity, financial disparity, and national economic growth: evidence from china. Rev Dev Econ 2012; 16(2): 342-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2012.00666.x]
[53]
Laffont JJ, Qian Y. The dynamics of reform and development in China: A political economy perspective. Eur Econ Rev 1999; 43(4-6): 1105-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00118-4]
[54]
Karamanou Irene, Vafeas Nikos. The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. J Account Res 2005; 43(3): 453-86.
[55]
Kothari SP, Shu S, Wysocki PD. Do managers withhold bad news? J Account Res 2009; 47(1): 241-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00318.x]
[56]
Uzun H, Szewczyk SH, Varma R. Board composition and corporate fraud. Financ Anal J 2004; 60(3): 33-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v60.n3.2619]
[57]
Jankensgård H. Between a rock and a hard place: New evidence on the relationship between ownership and voluntary disclosure. Int Rev Financ Anal 2018; 56: 281-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.09.009]
[58]
Fama EF, French KR. Choosing factors. J Financ Econ 2018; 128(2): 234-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012]
[59]
Yang H, Liu J, Lian Y, Jiang Y. Peer effects in corporate investment decisions: imitation and learning. Peking University J 2020; 4: 1375-400.
[60]
Mohr LB, March JG, Olsen JP. Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Am Polit Sci Rev 1976; 72: 408-1035.
[61]
Zhang T, Zhong T. Peer effects in financial decision making: a literature review and future research outlook. Foreign Econ Amp Manag 2018.
[62]
Xu S, Chen J, Zhao C, Han Y, Li N. A logistics transport device based on the Internet of Things that can be effectively fixed. ZL201921991297.7 (2019).