Abstract
Pre-eclampsia (PE) is one of the major pregnancy complications, affecting up to 10 % of
all pregnancies in some regions of the world. The clinical diagnosis, characterised by hypertension
and proteinuria often late during pregnancy, with the added inability to treat (other than delivery),
can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in both mother and unborn foetus. Moreover, as yet,
only low dose aspirin administration is accepted as a preventive measure for PE. This puts more
pressure to identify diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of PE from blood or urine for the non-invasive
screening of pregnant women before pregnancy becomes complicated. Over the years, a
number of DNA and protein molecules, such as cell-free DNA, VEGF, sFLT1, PlGF, PP-13, ADMA,
and several other biomarkers, have been linked to specific pathophysiological observations
and proposed as predictive markers for PE. However, their reliability and reproducibility have been
put to the test by numerous studies. The aim of this review is to cover the key clinical and biochemical
features of pregnancies complicated by PE and evaluate the robustness of data gathered from
various studies in order to better understand the link between the proposed biomarkers and the development
of PE so as to better quantify their relevance in diagnostic or prognostic applications.
The overall goal is to use such biomarkers for earlier detection, better molecular monitoring, and,
where possible, lessening of symptoms, hopefully leading to a reduction in the yearly PE-related
deaths worldwide.
Keywords:
Pre-eclampsia, pregnancy complications, endothelial dysfunction, biomarkers, diagnosis, prognosis.
Graphical Abstract
[6]
Nelson DB, Ziadie MS, McIntire DD, Rogers BB, Leveno KJ. Placental pathology suggesting that preeclampsia is more than one disease. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210(1): 66.
[31]
Noorbakhsh M, Kianpour M, Nematbakhsh M. Serum levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine, vascular endothelial growth factor, and nitric oxide metabolite levels in preeclampsia patients. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2013: 104213.
[38]
Tsiakkas A, Saiid Y, Wright A, Wright D, Nicolaides KH. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 30–34 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215(1): 87.
[54]
Haynes WG, Webb DJ. The endothelin family of peptides: Local hormones with diverse roles in health and disease? Clin Sci (Lond) 1993; 84(5): 485-500.
[59]
Maltaris T, Scalera F, Schlembach D, et al. Increased uterine arterial pressure and contractility of perfused swine uterus after treatment with serum from pre-eclamptic women and endothelin-1. Clin Sci (Lond) 2005; 109(2): 209-15.
[65]
Kalousova M, Muravska A, Zima T. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and preeclampsia. Advances in clinical chemistry. Elsevier 2014; pp. 169-209.
[69]
Moslemi Zadeh N, Naghshvar F, Peyvandi S, Gheshlaghi P. PP13 and PAPP-A in the first and second trimesters: Predictive factors for preeclampsia? ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012; 263871.
[76]
Chafetz I, Kuhnreich I, Sammar M, et al. First-trimester placental protein 13 screening for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(1): 35.
[80]
Ali FT, Ibrahim AM, Hassan NS, Soliman RM. Placental protein 13, galectin 14 and pentraxin 3 for prediction of pre-eclampsia in Egyptian patients. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2018; 7(6): 427-34.
[81]
Gadde R, Dayanand C, Sheela SR. Placental protein 13 and asymmetric dimethyl arginine for early assessment of preeclampsia. Biomed Res 2019; 30(2): 319-24.
[93]
Miehle K, Stepan H, Fasshauer M. Leptin, adiponectin and other adipokines in gestational diabetes mellitus and pre-eclampsia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012; 76(1): 2-11.