Abstract
Background: Nanopharmaceuticals serve as emerging forms of modern medicines, which include
nanomedicines, nanosimilars, nanotheranostics, nanodevices, and many more. In the last two decades, a large
number of nano-based products have reached the market and are being used clinically.
Objectives: Unlike conventional pharmaceutical products, nanopharmaceuticals behave differently both in vitro
and in vivo, and therefore, the development of their generic versions needs special attention to replicate the similar
drug release pattern leading to an identical therapeutic outcome. Further, drug-device combinations and 3D
products are the latest advancements in precision medicine delivery and development.
Methods: The regulatory guidelines for these products are being framed at many stages by various regulatory
agencies like USFDA/EMA and still are in infancy at the moment if we look at wider perspectives and applications
of nanomedicine.
Results: For a formulation scientist, it is much needed that well-explained and directive guidelines should be
made available before leading to the development of the generic versions of these nano-cargos.
Conclusion: Here, in this review, we have summarized the silent features of the regulatory perspectives related
to nanotechnology based next generation therapeutics and diagnostics.
Keywords:
Nanomedicine, nanosimilars, nanotheranostics, regulatory, pharmaceuticals, nanodevices, drug delivery.
[10]
Kesharwani D, Mishra S, Paul SD, Paliwal R, Satapathy T. The Functional Nanogel: An Exalted Carrier System. J Drug Deliv Ther 2019; 9(2-s): 570-82.
[14]
Bawa R, Melethil S, Simmons WJ, Harris D. Nanopharmaceuticals: patenting issues and FDA regulatory challenges. SciTech Lawyer 2008; 5(2): 10-5.
[34]
Ain QU. Current and future aspects of smart nanotheranostic agents in cancer therapeutics. In: Nanotheranostics. Cham: Springer 2019; pp. 213-27.
[36]
Davenport M. Closing the gap for generic nanomedicines. Chem Eng News 2014; 92(45): 10-3.
[38]
de Vlieger JS, Crommelin DJ, Tyner K, et al. Report of the AAPS guidance forum on the FDA draft guidance for industry: Drug products, including biological products, that contain nanomaterials AAPS J 2019; 21(4): 56.
[39]
De la Ossa DP. Quality aspects of Nano-based medicines. Proceedings of the SME workshop: focus on quality for medicines containing chemical entities. London, UK. 2014.Vol. 4
[50]
Vikas, Viswanadh MK, Priya V, Mehata AK, Muthu MS.. What are the unexplored facts about nanomicelles formed from docetaxel clinical injection?. 2006.
[51]
Anhalt K. Oral nanocrystal formulations and their biopharmaceutical characterization (Doctoral dissertation), University of Heidelberg, 2021.
[67]
EMA. 2000. "Summary of product characteristics- Renagel". Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/207/smpc#gref.
[73]
Nanoparticle technology now allows TriCor(R) to be taken with or without food. Illinois: Abbott Laboratories. 2006.
[75]
Colmar Eric. Summary reveiw for regulatory action. 2008. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/203923Orig1s000SumR.pdf.
[83]
rebuffs Monsanto S. First 3D-printed pill. Nature Biotech 2015; 33(10): 1014.