Abstract
Background: Treatment planning is one of the crucial stages of healthcare assessment
and delivery. Moreover, it also has a significant impact on patient outcomes and system efficiency.
With the evolution of transformative healthcare technologies, most areas of healthcare have started
collecting data at different levels, as a result of which there is a splurge in the size and complexity
of health data being generated every minute.
Introduction: This paper explores the different characteristics of health data with respect to big data.
Besides this, it also classifies research efforts in treatment planning on the basis of the informatics
domain being used, which includes medical informatics, imaging informatics and translational
bioinformatics.
Methods: This is a survey paper that reviews existing literature on the use of big data technologies
for treatment planning in the healthcare ecosystem. Therefore, a qualitative research methodology
was adopted for this work.
Results: Review of existing literature has been analyzed to identify potential gaps in research, identifying
and providing insights into high prospect areas for potential future research.
Conclusion: The use of big data for treatment planning is rapidly evolving, and findings of this research
can head start and streamline specific research pathways in the field.
Keywords:
Big data, treatment planning, medical informatics, medical imaging, translational bioinformatics, smart healthcare.
Graphical Abstract
[2]
Bakken S, Koleck TA, Dreisbach C, Hickey KT. Enabling precision health approaches for symptom science through big data and data science. Genomics of Pain and Co- Morbid Symptoms Cham: Springer. 2020; pp. 239-55.
[4]
Goceri E. Future healthcare: Will digital data lead to better care? New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Advances in Pure and Applied Sciences 2017; 8: 07-11.
[5]
Goceri E, Songul C. Mobile health technologies for patients with mental illness. International conference on advanced technologies. Antalya, Turkey. 2018.
[15]
Araujo LH, Horn L, Merritt RE, Shilo K, Xu-Welliver M, Carbone DP. Cancer of the lung: Non–small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology. 2020; pp. 1108-58.
[16]
Gomez DR, Li H, Zhang X, Chang JY, Liao Z, Lin SH. Lung cancerPro- ton Therapy Elsevier. 2021; pp. 205-14.
[17]
Little JW, Falace DA, Miller CS, Rhodus NL. Rheumatologic and connective tissue disorders.Little and Falace’s Dental Management of the Medically Compromised Patient (Eighth Edition) Mosby. 2013; pp. 320-46.
[19]
Goceri E, Songul C. Biomedical information technology: image based computer aided diagnosis systems. International Conference on Advanced Technologies. Antalaya, Turkey. 2018.
[22]
Göçeri E. A comparative evaluation for liver segmentation from spir images and a novel level set method using signed pressure force function (Doctoral dissertation, İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir)
[28]
Hagar Y, Albers D, Pivovarov R, Chase H, Dukic V. El- hadad N. Survival analysis with electronic health record data: Experiments with chronic kidney disease. Statistical Analy- sis and Data Mining: The ASA. Data Sci J 2014; 7(5): 385-403.
[35]
LeGrice I, Hunter P, Young A, Smaill B. The archi- tecture of the heart: A data–based model. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2001; 359(1783): 1217-32.
[40]
Aji A, Wang F, Saltz JH. Towards building a high perfor- mance spatial query system for large scale medical imaging data. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on advances in geographic information systems. 309-18.
[53]
Yang GZ, Andreu-Perez J, Hu X, Thiemjarus S. Multi- sensor fusion. Body sensor networks London: Springer. 2014; pp. 301-54.
[57]
Bottou L, Bousquet O. The tradeoffs of large scale learning. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2008; 20.