Abstract
Background: Quality is one of the three main characteristics of medicinal products.
The quality assurance process is multi-stage: during the manufacturing, quality control is the
commitment of the manufacturer, but after medicinal products become part of the distribution
and pharmacy network, analytical quality control is carried out within the program for Market
Surveillance. There are different approaches in conducting quality control of medicinal products
under the Market Surveillance Program.
Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the results obtained under two approaches: individual
testing and testing by groups with the same active substance.
Methods: In this study, comparative tests for assay and purity were carried out within two groups
of medicinal products from the antihypertensive group containing Amlodipine besilate and
Valsartan. Analyses were performed in accordance with the available pharmacopoeial monographs,
as well as those from literature sources.
Results: The results from the assay tests show a significant difference in the same product tested.
Analytical methods for the determination of impurities also show different results when analyzing
the same medicinal product.
Conclusion: Considering the performed analytical tests, the obtained results can be used to make
several conclusions and suggestions concerning the optimisation of the Annual Market Surveillance
Program.
Keywords:
Quality control, market surveillance program, amlodipine, valsartan, assay, purity.
[1]
Little, W.; McGivern, R. Management science for health, part II
In: Introduction to sociology – 1st canadian edition; William Little,
Ed.; Pressbooks: Amsterdam, 2012; chapter 19.
[2]
Tsvetanova, Y. Features of internal audit in pharmaceutical industry. Pharmacia, 2014, 61(2), 30-34.
[3]
Guidelines on good distribution practice of medicinal products for
human use. 2013. C68/01.
[5]
SG. Law on medicinal products in human medicine. April, 2007,
13, 31.
[6]
Executive Agency for Medicines. Planning and monitoring of the
national market. 2019. SOP 0008-3.
[7]
General European OMCL Network (GEON). Risk analysis model
for targeting market surveillance by OMCLs. General document,
PA/PH/OMCL, 2020, 80(6), 3-9.
[8]
Ilieva-Tonova, D.; Stoimenova, A.; Pencheva, I. Market surveillance and control of medicinal products in Bulgaria 2009 – 2015. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6(1), 366-373.
[9]
WHO. Guidelines on the conduct of surveys of the quality of
medicines. 2015.
[11]
Amlodipine besilate. European pharmacopoeia, 9.1; 2016, 8,
1491.
[12]
Amlodipine besylate tablets. USP41 – NF 36, 2017, 263-264.
[13]
Dinda, S. C.; Desireddy, R.B.; Kumar, P. J.; Chand, A. S.; Rao, P. S.; Kumar, B. A. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method
for quantitative analysis of Amlodipine besilate in pure and
Pharmaceutical formulations. Research J. Pharm. And Tech., 2013, 6(2)
[14]
Valsartan tablets. USP41 – NF 36, 2017, 4278-4279.
[15]
Valsartan. European pharmacopoeia, 2017(9.1), 2423.
[16]
Ghanty, S.; Das, R.; Maiti, S.; Sen, K.K. RP-HPLC methods for estimation of valsartan in solid oral dosage forms. J. Pharm. Sci., 2014, 3(2), 88-91.
[17]
Paladugo, A.N.D.; Rao, G.D.; Satyanarayana, B.; Poloju, D. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for quantification of valsartanand its pharmaceutical formulations. Int. J. Drug Devel. Res., 2013, 5(3), 199-205.