Correlation between Intrapartum Cardiotocogram Findings and Cord Blood pH in Term and Preterm Labors

Article ID: e031121195555 Pages: 8

  • * (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of intrapartum fetal monitoring by cardiotocograph (CTG) is to identify early signs of developing hypoxia so that appropriate action can be taken to improve the perinatal outcome. Although CTG findings are well known to monitor the progress of the labor due to the paucity of recommendations, there has always been a clinical dilemma as the term fetuses respond differently than a preterm fetus. However, umbilical cord blood pH can distinguish the infant at high risk for asphyxia and related sequel. Therefore, because of differences in fetal physiology in term and preterm fetuses, CTG findings vary, and hence the validity of CTG to determine fetal acidosis should be different.

Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to correlate abnormal intrapartum CTG findings with umbilical cord blood pH in term and preterm labor and thus evaluate the success of CTG in predicting fetal acidosis during labor.

Methods: The present study included 210 women in labor (70 preterm and 140 term) with abnormal intrapartum CTG that was classified as per 2015 revised International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetrician (FIGO) guidelines. Immediately after delivery, 2 ml Umbilical artery cord blood sample was taken in a pre-heparinized syringe for analysis, pH <=7.2 was taken as acidosis and pH >7.2 was taken as normal. The measured data were general maternal characteristics which included gravida status, associated comorbidities, method of induction and character of liquor, the intrapartum CTG tracings recorded, the cord arterial blood pH and the neonatal characteristics such as APGAR score and neonatal outcome.

Results: Data from 70 preterm labor was compared with 140 term labor. In this study, 20.9% of the babies had acidosis. Suspicious CTG due to decreased variability were more common in the preterm group than in the term group (21.4% vs. 8.6% p<0.05). Positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal CTG for fetal acidosis in the preterm group was found to be higher than that in the term group, PPV of pathological CTG being even higher than suspicious CTG. Women with suspicious CTG had 82% less risk of fetal acidosis as compared to pathological CTG. Women with Bradycardia had 5.9 times the risk of fetal acidosis as compared with normal and tachycardia.

Conclusion: Abnormal CTG should be managed appropriately without any delay to prevent acidosis and cord blood pH should be done in all labors with abnormal CTG. However, our findings of a higher incidence of lower cord blood pH and suspicious CTG due to decreased variability alone highlight the limitation of criteria currently used for interpretation of CTG in preterm labors.

Keywords: Intrapartum monitoring, cardiotocograph, term labor, preterm labor, FIGO guidelines, umbilical cord blood pH.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Ray C, Ray A. Intrapartum cardiotocography and its correlation with umbilical cord blood pH in term pregnancies: a prospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017; 6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172555]
[2]
MacLennan A. A template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMJ 1999; 319(7216): 1054-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7216.1054] [PMID: 10521205]
[3]
Afors K, Chandraharan E. Use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring in a preterm fetus: clinical dilemmas and recommendations for practice. J Pregnancy 2011; 2011: 848794.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/848794] [PMID: 21922045]
[4]
Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; (9): Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007863.pub4/full
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007863.pub4]
[5]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114(1): 192-202.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106] [PMID: 19546798]
[6]
To WW, Leung WC. The incidence of abnormal findings from intrapartum cardiotocogram monitoring in term and preterm labours. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38(3): 258-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb03061.x] [PMID: 9761148]
[7]
The 2015 FIGO classification of intrapartum cardiotocography: differences to the STAN classification « Neoventa Medical. 2015. Available from: https://www.neoventa.com/2015/12/the-2015-figo- classification-of-intrapartum-cardiotocography-differences- to-the-stan-classification/
[8]
Intrapartum care: Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth | Guidance | NICE. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg55
[9]
Sorokin Y, Dierker LJ, Pillay SK, Zador IE, Schreiner ML, Rosen MG. The association between fetal heart rate patterns and fetal movements in pregnancies between 20 and 30 weeksƒ?(tm) gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143(3): 243-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90812-2] [PMID: 7081342]
[10]
Smith CV, Phelan JP, Paul RH. A prospective analysis of the influence of gestational age on the baseline fetal heart rate and reactivity in a low-risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153(7): 780-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90346-1] [PMID: 4073143]
[11]
Chan S, To WW. Correlation between intrapartum cardiotocogram findings and cord blood ph in term and preterm labours. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery 2009; 9: 36-42.
[12]
Aboulghar WM, Ibrahim MA, Allam IS, Hosny W, Otify M. Validity of cardiotocography in the diagnosis of acute fetal hypoxia in low resources settings. Internet J Gynecl Obstet 2013; 17(1): 1-8.
[13]
Modarressnejad V. Umbilical cord blood pH and risk factors for acidaemia in neonates in Kerman. East Mediterr Health J 2005; 11(1-2): 96-101.
[PMID: 16532677]
[14]
Kaban A, Cengiz H, Kaban I, A-zcan A, Karaka-Y S. The Success of Cardiotocography in predicting Perinatal Outcome. J Clin Exp Invest 2012; 3(2): 168-71.
[15]
Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L. The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples. BJOG 2012; 119(7): 824-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03335.x] [PMID: 22571747]
[16]
Page FO, Martin JN, Palmer SM, et al. Correlation of neonatal acid-base status with Apgar scores and fetal heart rate tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154(6): 1306-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(86)90717-9] [PMID: 3717240]
[17]
Khan SN, Ahmed GS, Abutaleb AM, Hathal MA. Is the determination of umbilical cord arterial blood gases necessary in all deliveries? Analysis in a high-risk population. J Perinatol 1995; 15(1): 39-42.
[PMID: 7650552]
[18]
Thorp JA, Rushing RS. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26(4): 695-709.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70107-8] [PMID: 10587963]
[19]
Catlin EA, Carpenter MW, Brann BS IV, et al. The Apgar score revisited: influence of gestational age. J Pediatr 1986; 109(5): 865-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(86)80715-6] [PMID: 3772665]
[20]
Gardner MO, Goldenberg RL, Gaudier FL, Dubard MB, Nelson KG, Hauth JC. Predicting low Apgar scores of infants weighing less than 1000 grams: The effect of corticosteroids. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85(2): 170-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(94)00372-K] [PMID: 7824226]
[21]
Visser GH, Sadovsky G, Nicolaides KH. Antepartum heart rate patterns in small-for-gestational-age third-trimester fetuses: correlations with blood gas values obtained at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162(3): 698-703.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)90989-K] [PMID: 2316573]
[22]
Tasnim N, Mahmud G, Akram S. Predictive accuracy of intrapartum cardiotocography in terms of fetal acid base status at birth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009; 19(10): 632-5.
[PMID: 19811714]
[23]
Chez BF, Harvey MG, Harvey CJ. Intrapartum fetal monitoring: Past, present, and future. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2000; 14(3): 1-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005237-200012000-00002] [PMID: 11930376]