Abstract
Objective: The present study was conducted to investigate the complications of circumcision
and determine its prevalence in the studied areas.
Methods: In this study, the electronic databases of Scopus, PubMed, SID, Web of Science and Magiran
were selected to search the total population of observational studies published in Persian and
English on the prevalence and circumcision complications in girls. The keywords searched for this
purpose were as follows: female genital mutilation, Infibulations, Epidemiologic Methods, Clitorectomies,
Female Circumcision, Clitorectomy, Clitoridectomy Complications, Prevalence, associated
disease, coexistent conditions, and sequels associated with concomitant conditions, and coexistent
disease and their Persian equivalent words. Prevalence estimates of all studies were pooled using a
random-effects model at a confidence level of 95%. The bias in the published results of the studies
and any reporting errors were examined using Begg and Egger’s statistical tests. Out of 3756
studies, 45 articles were included in the study after excluding irrelevant and repetitive articles.
Results: After reviewing the articles in this field, it was determined that female genital mutilation
has sexual complications, problems during childbirth, physical and psychological complications.
The prevalence of female genital circumcision in the world and Iran in the study areas was obtained
using the random effect model, which was estimated to be 61% (95%, CI = 0.49, 0.73) and
61% (95%, CI = 0.52, 0.70), respectively. In other areas, the prevalence was reported to be close to
zero. In total, among different countries of the world, of the 207,709 participants surveyed,
110,596 had undergone female genital circumcision (110,596 of 207,709).
Conclusion: The effects of female genital mutilation on girls are high and require government intervention
in various countries.
Keywords:
Female circumcision, clitorectomy, prevalence, complications, meta-analysis, systematic review.
Graphical Abstract
[2]
Organization WH. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation World Health Organization. 2016.
[3]
Unicef. Female Genital Mutilation/cutting: a Global Concern. UNICEF's Data Work on FGM/C: Unicef 2016.
[4]
Haji Foghaha M, Golozar S, Alizadeh S. Female genital mutilation: religious coercion or cultural requirement? IJOGI 2016; 19(25): 8-16.
[9]
Female genital mutilation: female genital mutilation is recognized internationally as a violation of the human rights of girls and women: fact sheet World Health Organization. 2014.
[11]
Halle-Ekane G, Guidona N, Mbuagbaw L, Mengouo A, Mbu R. Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes inthe Far-North Region, Cameroon: A Case-Control Study. Arch Curr Res Int 2019; 1-9.
[15]
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions John Wiley & Sons. 2011.
[23]
Ndikom CM, Ogungbenro FA, Ojeleye OA. Perceptionand Practice of Female Genital Cutting Among Mothers in Ibadan, Nigeria. International Journal of Nursing and Health Science 2017; 4(6): 71-80.
[27]
Yasin Y. Prevalence of female genital mutilation among school girls in El Mansoura Center, El-Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt iosr-jdms 2014; 13: 11-76..
[30]
Osifo DO, Evbuomwan I. Female genital mutilation among Edo people: the complications and pattern of presentation at a pediatric surgery unit, Benin City. Afr J Reprod Health 2009; 13(1): 17-25.
[33]
Dehghankhalili M, Fallahi S, Mahmudi F, Ghaffarpasand F, Shahrzad ME, Taghavi M, et al. Epidemiology, regional characteristics, knowledge, and attitude toward female genital mutilation/cutting in southern Iran. J Sex Med 2015; 12(7): 1577-1583..
[40]
Kizilhan JI. Impact of psychological disorders after female genital mutilation among Kurdish girls in Northern Iraq. Eur J Psychiatry 2011; 25(2): 92-100.
[42]
Ibrahim ZM, Ahmed MR, Mostafa RM. Psychosexual impact of female genital mutilation/cutting among Egyptian women. Hum androl 2012; 2(2): 36-41..
[43]
Mahmoudi O, Hosseini E. Psychosexual complications of female genital mutilation for couples: A comparative study. Majallah-i Danishgah-i Ulum-i Pizishki-i Kirmanshah 2017; 20: 135-40.
[44]
Shay TZ, Haidar J, Kogi-Makau W. Magnitude of and driving factors for female genital cutting in schoolgirls in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A crosssectional study. S Afr j child health 2010; 4(3): 78-82..
[45]
Barakat AA, Mosleh H. Prevalence of Female Genital Cutting among University Students in Egypt. J Am Sci 2012; 8(11): 15-21.
[49]
Yousef F, Hamed A, Mostafa N. Female Genital Cutting: Prevalence, knowledge and attitude of Sohage University level Students. Upper Egypt EJCM 2017; 35(1): 17-25.
[54]
Obi A, Igbinadolor O. Prevalence of female genital mutilation and its determinants among pregnant women in Benin City, Nigeria. Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care 2018; 30(2): 12-21.
[55]
Abiodun AA, Oyejola BA, Job O. Female circumcision in Nigeria, prevalence and attitudes. CPJ 2011. 2011133:17202.2012.
[60]
Ahadi H, Khadivzadeh T, Seyyedialavi G, Esmaili H. Women’s circumcision in Minab: Prevalence, knowledge, attitude. JQUMS 2003; 7(4): 14-20.
[61]
Bahrami M, Ghaderi E, Farazi E, Bahramy A. The prevalence of female genital mutilation and related factors among women in Kamyaran, Iran. Chronic Dis J 2018; 6(3): 113-9.