Abstract
Recently, a significant number of breast cancer (BC) patients have been diagnosed at an
early stage. It is therefore critical to accurately predict the risk of recurrence and distant metastasis for
better management of BC in this setting. Clinicopathologic patterns, particularly lymph node status,
tumor size, and hormonal receptor status are routinely used to identify women at increased risk of recurrence.
However, these factors have limitations regarding their predictive ability for late metastasis
risk in patients with early BC. Emerging molecular signatures using gene expression-based approaches
have improved the prognostic and predictive accuracy for this indication. However, the use of their
based-scores for risk assessment has provided contradictory findings. Therefore, developing and using
newly emerged alternative predictive and prognostic biomarkers for identifying patients at high- and
low-risk is of great importance. The present review discusses some serum biomarkers and multigene
profiling scores for predicting late recurrence and distant metastasis in early-stage BC based on recently
published studies and clinical trials.
Keywords:
Early breast cancer, late recurrence, distant metastasis, predictive biomarkers.
Graphical Abstract
[21]
Colomer R, Aranda-López I, Albanell J, García-Caballero T, Ciruelos E, López-García M Á. Biomarkers in breast cancer: a consensus
statement by the spanish society of medical oncology and the spanish
society of pathology. clinical & translational oncology : official
publication of the federation of spanish oncology societies and of
the national cancer Institute of Mexico 2018; 20(7): 815-26.
[73]
Mittempergher L, Delahaye LJ, Witteveen A, et al. Mamma print and blueprint molecular diagnostics using targeted rna nextgeneration
sequencing technology. J Mol Diagn 2019; S1525-1578(18): 30483-5.
[89]
Hannouf MB, Brezden-Masley C, Raphael J, Brackstone M. A review of gene expression profiling in early-stage er+/her2- breast cancer with a focus on the pam50 risk of recurrence assay. EMJ Oncol 2019; 7(Suppl. 1): 2-13.
[94]
Rodriguez CS, Garcia-Muñoz M, Sancho M, et al. Impact of the
Prosigna® PAM50 (PAM50) assay on adjuvant clinical decision
making in patients with early stage breast cancer: Results of a
prospective multicenter public program. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35(15_suppl): e12062-2.
[95]
Esin E, Oksuzoglu BO, Markoc F, et al. Prosigna® PAM50 assay
for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: A single center, decision
impact study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio
Breast Cancer Symposium; San Antonio, TX; Philadelphia
(PA): AACR. 2019 Cancer Res.; 79.(4 Suppl) Abstract nr P3-08.
[135]
Wang W, Chen Q, Wang RB, et al. Correlation between the expression of BRCA-1 and BAG-1 proteins in triple negative breast cancer and its sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. Biomed Res 2017; 28(15): 6654-61.