Abstract
Objective: To discuss the potential risks and their mitigation strategies in the post-conduct
phase of the trial.
Background: Risk management is very important for the clinical trial (CT) to ensure that the trial delivers
its desired outcome(s) in terms of achieving protocol objective and regulatory compliance.
Methodology: Experienced members of the clinical operation team of a pharmaceutical major underwent
a series of sessions to identify risks associated with the post-conduct phase of CT and developed
mitigation strategies based on own experiences and guidance documents. The risks were categorized
into major, minor and critical risks.
Results: In the post-conduct phase of a clinical trial, critical risk identified were; failure to communicate
to the stakeholder about premature termination of the trial, mismatch of statistical analysis results
and protocol objective/ regulatory requirement, clinical study report (CSR) noncompliant with
regulatory requirements or delay in CSR preparation. Safety checks suggested to mitigate these risks
including the development of related checklist or shell of relevant documents and its review by clinical
development, quality assurance (QA) and regulatory affairs (RA) team prior to finalization. Additionally,
six major and five minor risk areas were identified and safety checks were suggested.
Conclusion: Sponsors must act proactively to ensure a systematic approach to conduct various post
conduct trial activities and the plans to mitigate the risks that could affect the quality and outcome of
the clinical trial.
Future Perspective: A close coordination with all stakeholders for timely anticipation of risks and
execution of mitigation strategies are required for successful CT outcomes.
Keywords:
Clinical trial, mitigation plan, post conduct phase, quality assurance (QA), regulatory affairs (RA), risks.
Graphical Abstract
[1]
Benta D, Podean IM, Mircean C. On best practices for risk management in complex projects. Inf Econ 2011; 15: 142.
[2]
Group IEW, Ed. ICH harmonized tripartite guideline, Quality risk management Q9. International Conference of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
[5]
Transforming Clinical Research in the United States. In: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation Washington (DC). US: National Academies Press 2010.
[8]
Ansmann EB, Hecht A, Henn DK, et al. The future of monitoring in clinical research - a holistic approach: Linking risk-based monitoring with quality management principles. German Medical Science:GMS e-journal 2013. 11: Doc04.
[10]
Macri M. Managing clinical trial risk: It's a tough job, but one person has to do it.
[11]
Eric P. Brass. Letter to editor: Premature termination of clinical trials. JAMA 2003; 290-595.
[12]
Hecht A, Busch-Heidger B, Gertzen H, et al. Quality expectations and tolerance limits of trial master files (TMF) - Developing a risk-based approach for quality assessments of TMFs. Ger Med Sci 2015; 13: Doc23.
[17]
Lièvre M, Boyd K, Ménard J, et al. Premature discontinuation of clinical trial for reasons not related to efficacy, safety, or feasibility Commentary: Early discontinuation violates Helsinki principles. BMJ 2001; 322: 603-6.
[18]
Guideline IHT. Structure and content of clinical study reports E3. Curr Sep 1995; 4: 24.
[21]
ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R1). International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Washington, DC. 1996.
[24]
Chappell P, Knirsch C, Jose Alvir J, et al. Risk assessment and mitigation a quantitative approach to enhancing risk assessment and mitigation in drug development. Appl Clin Trials 2012; 21: 1.